The world’s “reality” is being engineered through sophisticated technological systems and digital barriers. These create a manufactured environment controlled by technocracy, a system of control passed down through institutions and bloodlines, involving key figures such as the Huxley brothers and the Rockefeller family.
The technocratic agenda has shifted from creating compliant workers to managing population reduction, with a focus on artificial intelligence, automation and climate change messaging.
Joshua Stylman suggests that resistance to the technocratic grid can be achieved through actions such as implementing strong privacy practices, developing critical media literacy skills and building local support networks. He also recommends supporting decentralised technologies and creating parallel systems for education and information sharing.
Yesterday, Brownstone Institute published an essay by Joshua Stylman titled ‘The Technocratic Blueprint’. We have paraphrased Stylman’s essay below but we encourage our readers to take the time to read the full essay which you can find HERE or HERE.
The world is increasingly engineered through sophisticated technological systems and invisible digital constraints, creating a manufactured environment that is similar to the one depicted in The Truman Show, where reality itself is manipulated and controlled.
The driving force behind this manufactured world is technocracy, a system of control that has been passed down through institutions and bloodlines, with key figures such as Thomas Henry Huxley, known as “Darwin’s Bulldog,” and his descendants, including Aldous and Julian Huxley, playing important roles in shaping the modern world order.
The connections between these people and other influential families, such as the Darwins and the Rockefellers, have created a powerful nexus of influence that spans science, culture and governance, and has evolved to incorporate new technological capabilities.
Rockefeller once declared that “we need a nation of workers, not thinkers.”
Today, the focus of the technocratic agenda has shifted from creating compliant workers to managing population reduction, as artificial intelligence and automation eliminate the need for human labour, with BlackRock CEO Larry Fink explicitly stating that countries with declining populations will be more easily able to substitute humans with machines.
The evolving agenda is reflected in various developments, including climate change messaging, declining birth rates and the normalisation of euthanasia, which are not random but rather logical extensions of the technocratic plan to manage and control the population.
Normalising Control Through Technological Change
The concept of a “World Brain,” envisioned by H.G. Wells in 1937, has become a reality with the advent of the internet. It has also enabled the creation of a “Digital Hive Mind” that can be controlled and manipulated by those in power, further solidifying the technocratic grip on society.
The concept of technocratic governance, as outlined by H.G. Wells in ‘The Open Conspiracy’, involves a movement of intelligent people who would lead a global transformation, with a class of educated and rational people assuming control of society. “Even his fictional work ‘Shape of Things to Come’ reads like a blueprint, particularly in its description of how a pandemic might facilitate global governance,” Stylman said.
This plan found its institutional expression through Julian Huxley, who as the first Director-General of UNESCO, declared that the organisation’s philosophy should be a scientific world humanism, global in extent and evolutionary in background, which would eventually replace traditional faith with a new religious orthodoxy centred on science.
“This quasi-religious devotion to scientific authority would become the framework for today’s unquestioning acceptance of expert proclamations on everything from vaccine mandates to climate policies,” Stylman explained.
The Huxley family, including Julian and his brother Aldous, played a significant role in shaping this transformation, with Julian establishing the institutional framework for scientific world humanism at UNESCO, and Aldous revealing the psychological methodology for controlling populations through rapid technological change and gradual implementation of new control systems.
In his 1958 interview with Mike Wallace, Aldous explained how rapid technological change could overwhelm populations, making them “lose their capacity for critical analysis.” Most crucially, Aldous emphasised the importance of “gradual” implementation.
The strategy of gradualism, which involves carefully pacing technological and social changes to manage resistance and normalise new control systems over time, mirrors the Fabian Society’s approach and has been employed in various areas, including the erosion of privacy rights and the implementation of digital surveillance systems.
Zbigniew Brzezinski later expanded on gradual implementation in his book ‘Between Two Ages’ which described a coming “technetronic era” marked by surveillance of citizens, control through technology, manipulation of behaviour and global information networks, with an elite dominating society and maintaining continuous surveillance over citizens.
The idea of a “World Brain,” an interconnected global information network, has become a reality through the rise of artificial intelligence (“AI”) and the internet.
The centralisation of knowledge and data is a key aspect of the technocratic ambition for an AI-powered global society, as seen in initiatives like the AI World Society, which mirrors the predictions of George Orwell’s dystopian society, where telescreens, Newspeak, memory holes and thoughtcrime have become a reality through smart devices, content moderation, digital censorship and social credit systems.
Corporate media has played a significant role in promoting the “never offline” mentality, which has led to the widespread adoption of wearable surveillance devices that converge human biology and digital technology, known as the “Internet of Bodies,” and this pattern of previewing control systems through corporate media serves to normalise surveillance and position resistance as futile or backwards-looking.
Normalising the Future of Control
The ideas of visionaries like H.G. Wells and Aldous Huxley, who predicted control through pleasure, have been implemented through institutional frameworks, including the careful cultivation of future leaders who think and act as one, as outlined in Cecil Rhodes’ will, which aimed to create a new kind of empire through the creation of an elite network that would extend British influence globally.
The Round Table Movement, which emerged from Rhodes’ blueprint, established influential groups in key countries, creating informal networks that shaped global policy for generations and led to the formation of key institutions of global governance, including the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations.
These organisations played a significant role in creating the intellectual framework for policy-making and their members went on to establish the League of Nations, the United Nations (“UN”) and the Bretton Woods system, with Alice Bailey’s vision, articulated through Lucis Trust, influencing the spiritual and philosophical foundations of the UN.
The network of influence envisioned by Rhodes has undergone a profound transformation since his time, from the 1.0 model of globalism that operated through nation states and colonialism to today’s Globalism 2.0, which operates through corporate and financial institutions, steering power toward centralised global governance without the need for formal empire.
Organisations like the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and Tavistock Institute have spent decades guiding global programmes and policies, gradually centralising power, influence, and resources among an increasingly concentrated elite.
The Rhodes Scholarships have served as a pipeline for identifying and cultivating future leaders who would advance the technocratic agenda while Bailey’s writings, particularly in ‘The Externalisation of the Hierarchy’, outlined a vision for global transformation that parallels many current UN initiatives, including reformed education systems, environmental programs, and economic integration, with a target date of 2025 for the “externalisation of the hierarchy”, which aligns with the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Today this game plan manifests through the World Economic Forum (“WEF”). Led by Klaus Schwab, who was mentored by Henry Kissinger, WEF is actively shaping this new world order, with its Young Global Leaders programme “penetrating cabinets” in countries around the world.
Normalising Technocratic Ideas
Edward Bernays, nephew of Sigmund Freud, developed the psychological framework for modern marketing and social media manipulation, which is now used to engineer consent and manage public opinion. His techniques are being used to create predictive programming, where future control systems are presented as entertainment, normalising them before implementation.
The co-founder of Netflix, Marc Bernays Randolph, is Edward Bernays’ great-nephew, which demonstrates how family influences and bloodlines continue shaping our cultural consumption today.
Predictive programming operates through digital platforms and entertainment media, such as Hollywood, which serves as a primary vehicle for normalising technocratic ideas, and by repeatedly exposing people to future events or control systems, the public becomes psychologically conditioned to accept them as natural occurrences when they manifest in reality.
Movies and TV shows consistently present future scenarios that later become reality, such as personalised advertising, brain-computer interfaces, social credit scores and mass surveillance, which are now being implemented in various forms. Stylman gives some specific examples of movies and children’s shows in his essay that demonstrate this which we have not included here.
Institutional Networks for Technocratic Control
While Bernays and his successors developed the psychological framework for mass influence, implementing these ideas at the scale required a robust institutional architecture. This was developed through networks of influence, including organisations like the Fabian Society, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation.
These institutions have used strategic funding and policy implementation to restructure society, creating interconnected mechanisms of control over health, knowledge, and other domains, often under the guise of philanthropy.
Modern technology philanthropists, such as Bill Gates, are continuing this pattern of social engineering, using their foundations to shape global health policy, invest in digital ID systems and control agricultural holdings, while also investing in surveillance technologies and synthetic foods. His work demonstrates how modern philanthropists have perfected their predecessors’ methods of using charitable giving to engineer social transformation.
The overall effect of these efforts is the creation of a technocratic system that is increasingly shaping the world, often without triggering significant resistance, due to the gradual and systematic nature of the changes being implemented.
Modern Implementation of Control Systems
Technocracy has its roots in predictions of resource scarcity and environmental concerns, which have led to the development of climate change messaging and population control initiatives, ultimately enabling control through resource allocation and demographic engineering.
The modern implementation of technocratic control systems has achieved a level of control that earlier technocrats could only imagine. It is characterised by the convergence of digital infrastructure, surveillance and behavioural modification with smart devices, AI assistants and algorithmic filters shaping our daily lives and worldviews.
The digital environment monitors and shapes our behaviour through devices we willingly embrace, including news and information flow, workplace surveillance, automation, entertainment, social interactions and purchases, all of which are tracked and influenced through targeted advertising and recommendation systems.
The infrastructure of technocracy, including digital surveillance and behavioural modification algorithms, provides the practical means for implementing control at scale, far beyond anything depicted in earlier concepts, with our health decisions, children’s education, travel and, increasingly, financial transactions all being guided and monitored through digital systems.
The next phase of control systems is already emerging, with the development of Central Bank Digital Currencies (“CBDCs”), Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) scores and AI governance, which will create a comprehensive system of financial control, effectively codifying “cancel culture,” and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives into the monetary system.
Initiatives like the Internet of Bodies and the development of smart cities, overseen by governing bodies like the C40 network, further demonstrate how the technocratic vision is being implemented in the present day. These have the goal of creating a highly controlled and monitored society, as envisioned by earlier thinkers that have been outlined in Stylman’s essay.
Resisting the Technocratic Grid
The technocratic future is already here, Stylman warned. But understanding the vision of its key thinkers gives us the power to resist the control systems that are increasingly woven into the fabric of modern life through biological and psychological means.
To resist these control systems, Stylman suggested we take actions such as implementing strong privacy practices, including encryption, data minimisation and secure communications, as well as developing critical media literacy skills and maintaining analogue alternatives to digital systems.
Family and community building is also crucial. This can be achieved by creating local support networks independent of digital platforms, teaching children critical thinking and pattern recognition, and establishing community-based economic alternatives.
Systemic approaches to resistance include supporting and developing decentralised technologies, creating parallel systems for education and information sharing, building alternative economic structures, and developing local food and energy independence.
Our daily resistance must occur through conscious engagement, using technology without being used by it, consuming entertainment while understanding its programming and participating in digital platforms while maintaining privacy. Each choice becomes an act of conscious resistance. While we cannot completely escape the technocratic grid, we can maintain our humanity within it through conscious action and local connection.
Comments