Search Results

'Israelis' Zionists joke about raping and murdering Palestinians during the founding of Israel and subsequent years. It was the same then as it is now, except it's worse .. Hamas did NOT bake a Jewish baby in an oven. However, the Israelis did bake a Palestinian child in an oven and made the child’s father watch. Zionism the evil ideology Palestinian shot dead for throwing pebbles. Foad Abou Sabha, a Palestinian with special needs was protesting in front of the military checkpoint at the main entrance to his village 2 days ago. He was shot dead by the Israeli army unit, making him one of dozen civilians killed in the West Bank since 7-Oct.

A piece of garbage for $46.5 million?

https://www.newstarget.com/2023-11-02-gods-chosen-israel-shockingly-racist-intolerant.html Zionist-brainwashed evangelicals have this rosy picture in their minds about Israel that hearkens back to purist imagery about a "land of milk and honey." The reality, though, is much, much different. The truth that you will never hear about Israel from the media – because Israel controls the media – is that "God's chosen" are among the most racist, intolerant and hateful people in the entire world. "Israel is one of the most racist countries in the world," explains the man in the following video, which depicts the true history about modern-day Israel that Western peoples, including Americans, are never told. "From its inception, the whole idea of Israel as a country was based on racism. Israel was conceived as a Jewish state. And while there's nothing wrong in principle with Jews having a homeland, the problem is that they insisted that that homeland had to be Palestine, which already belonged to someone: the Palestinians." "The slogan of Israel's founders was 'A land for a people without a land,' but deep down they all knew that the only way to have a Jewish majority in Palestine, an Arab country, was to expel the Arabs." (Related: "God's chosen" are starving out the Palestinians in their Holodomor-style genocide of the people of Gaza.) Half of Israelis are JEWISH SUPREMACISTS who believe "most Jews are better than most non-Jews because they were born Jews" One of the founders of Israel, Yosef Weitz, infamously wrote: "There is no room in the country for both [Arab and Jewish] peoples ... there is no way but to transfer the [Palestinian] Arabs from here to the neighboring countries.'" In other words, the mass expulsion and massacre of Arabs in a years-long process called Nakba has to happen in order to satiate the Jewish lust for ownership of Palestinian land. "And when you found a country based on racial exclusion, you're going to get a culture that fosters and celebrates racial exclusion because countries that commit terrible atrocities rarely acknowledge committing those atrocities," the video above explains. "And the presence of Palestinians who remained in Palestine became a constant reminder, not only of the violence that founded Israel, but of the constantly looming threat that they might come back and try to reclaim their land." Videos emerge out of Israel on the daily depicting Jewish supremacy and all the hate that comes with it. Self-chosen Israelis routinely call for all Arabs to die, for Christians to be spit on, and for Palestinians to be murdered and mocked. In one horrific display, a group of Jewish supremacists was seen sitting atop a hill overlooking Gaza in lawn chairs while they watched the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) carpet bomb innocent civilians in Gaza "for entertainment." Here are some other inconvenient facts about Israel that you will never hear from the mainstream media: • Two-thirds of Israeli teenagers are Jewish supremacists who believe that Arabs are less intelligent, uncultured and violent • Half of all Israelis are Jewish supremacists who say they would not even live in the same building as an Arab, would not befriend Arabs, would not let their children befriend Arabs and would not let Arabs into their homes • Sixty percent of Israeli Jews want segregation from Arabs • Half of all Jews believe that "most Jews are better than most non-Jews because they were born Jews" "Not only are these views widely held in Israeli society, they're also represented in government, which codifies these sentiments into law," the video explains. Check out the full video above to learn more about the disturbing history of Israel and the Jewish supremacy that rules the nation-state. More related news about the Jewish supremacy that plagues the nation-state known as Israel can be found at Genocide.news.

https://expose-news.com/2023/11/03/bill-gates-funding-70mil-acres-deforestation-in-america/ Bill Gates and other investors are betting Kodama Systems can reduce carbon dioxide in the air by chopping down and burying trees. The move will see 70 million acres of forests, mostly in the Western United States, cut down over the next decade. After cutting down the trees, Kodama plans to bury them – to reduce global warming. However, “global warming” is a scam to enable the rich to become richer and the real reason for the destruction of forests is to reap saleable carbon offsets. The Carbon Cycle The following text in this section is extracted from National Geographic’s encyclopaedia intended for children aged 10 to 13. Carbon is in a constant state of movement from place to place. It is stored in what are known as reservoirs, and it moves between these reservoirs through a variety of processes, including photosynthesis, burning fossil fuels, and simply releasing breath from the lungs. The movement of carbon from reservoir to reservoir is known as the carbon cycle. Carbon can be stored in a variety of reservoirs, including plants and animals, which is why they are considered carbon life forms. Carbon is used by plants to build leaves and stems, which are then digested by animals and used for cellular growth. In the atmosphere, carbon is stored in the form of gases, such as carbon dioxide. It is also stored in oceans, captured by many types of marine organisms. Some organisms, such as clams or coral, use the carbon to form shells and skeletons. Most of the carbon on the planet is contained within rocks, minerals, and other sediment buried beneath the surface of the planet. Because Earth is a closed system, the amount of carbon on the planet never changes. The carbon cycle is vital to life on Earth. Nature tends to keep carbon levels balanced, meaning that the amount of carbon naturally released from reservoirs is equal to the amount that is naturally absorbed by reservoirs. Maintaining this carbon balance allows the planet to remain hospitable for life. Read more: The Carbon Cycle for Grades 5-8, Encyclopaedic Entry, National Geographic Anthropogenic Climate Change is a Fraud The National Geographic Encyclopaedic Entry above ends with the sentence: “Scientists believe that humans have upset this [carbon] balance by burning fossil fuels, which has added more carbon to the atmosphere than usual and led to climate change and global warming.” National Geographic must be referring to either corporately funded scientists or scientists employed by corporations. As we will see in the next section, scientists who are truly concerned about the planet and the life it supports reveal the facts. Anthropogenic or human-caused climate change is a fraud and has been known to be a fraud from the outset. This was demonstrably revealed to the world in 2009 with the release of leaked emails dubbed Climategate. As it leads into the next section, it’s also worth noting an eye-opening 2013 article published by Forbes that used quotes from climate alarmists to reveal the truth about the climate change agenda. The article was aptly titled: ‘In Their Own Words: Climate Alarmists Debunk Their ‘Science’.’ Bill Gates Plans to Cut Down Trees At the end of July, Forbes was given the task of promoting Gates’ latest plan to destroy and capitalise on the natural world in the name of “climate change” in an article titled: ‘Chop Down Forests to Save the Planet? Maybe Not as Crazy as it Sounds’. Yes, it is as crazy as it sounds. At least Forbes was honest enough to highlight why the article was being published in its drop head: “Bill Gates and other investors are betting Kodama Systems can reduce carbon dioxide in the air by chopping down and burying trees. Now if only Uncle Sam would get on board with tax credits, too.” The final sentence gives a clue to what this latest scam is all about – money. Let’s see what the article has to say and how Forbes manipulates and outright lies to try to sell the idea that Gates and other investors are doing this for the good of the planet. It’s not long into the article that Forbes links carbon to trading of carbon credits and carbon offsets: Yes, the conventional idea is to plant trees to soak up carbon dioxide from the air and to then sell credits to corporations, private jet owners and others who need or want to offset their emissions. But scientists say burying trees can reduce global warming as well – particularly if those trees would otherwise end up burning or decaying, spewing their stored carbon into the air. Chop Down Forests to Save the Planet? Maybe Not as Crazy as it Sounds, Forbes, 28 July 2023 Trees are “spewing” carbon into the air. Really? It’s shameless propaganda. Related: They’re using indoctrination tools on you right now, today. And it’s only going to get worse Forbes may benefit from reading National Geographic’s encyclopaedia for children. And then, if the author feels he can cope with more grown-up content, perhaps he can listen to Patrick Moore explain that the idea of CO2 being a pollutant is dangerous propaganda. Or perhaps he can examine satellite imagery that demonstrates how CO2 as nature’s fertilizer has steadily been enriching Earth’s atmosphere. And, should Forbes feel it necessary to fall back on the default “human-caused climate crisis” narrative, a study conducted on data from 1750 to 2018 will clarify things for him. The study estimated that the value of the atmospheric concentration of anthropogenic fossil-derived CO2 in 2018 was 46.84 ppm out of a total of 405.40 ppm. Forbes then turned to wildfires to argue the case for Bill Gates and other investors: California’s enormous 2020 wildfires drove home the risks to air, property and life posed by overgrown forests … To help address the problem, the U.S. Forest Service aims to thin out 70 million acres of western forests, mostly in California, over the next decade, extracting more than 1 billion tonnes of bone-dry biomass. Chop Down Forests to Save the Planet? Maybe Not as Crazy as it Sounds, Forbes, 28 July 2023 According to Roger Pielke, a professor in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Colorado, Canada’s wildfire trends show no increase in recent decades, wildfires used to be much more extensive in past centuries and wildfires are a part of the natural ecosystem. Wildfires across the world that corporately funded media have enthusiastically publicised have been the result of man’s intervention – but not the human-caused climate change that corporate media supports. The fires in Greece, Spain, Italy and the Amazon rainforest are most likely due to arson. And regarding the recent fires in Hawaii – there are so many questions without honest answers concerning the destruction of Lahaina in Maui, that even people who normally trust the government are starting to wonder what has really happened there. Forbes then attempts to justify burying wood in man-made vaults, which should be a nice little earner. In fact, Yale Carbon Containment Lab (“CC Lab”), Kodama’s partner, is hoping to make a business out of “earthen vaults” or “biomass vaults.” It is customary, after such forest thinning, for logs of marketable size to go to sawmills, with most of the rest piled up and later burned under controlled conditions. Kodama wants to bury the leftovers instead – in earthen vaults designed to maintain dry and anoxic (oxygen-free) conditions and protect the wood from rotting or burning. Chop Down Forests to Save the Planet? Maybe Not as Crazy as it Sounds, Forbes, 28 July 2023 CC Lab admits biomass vaults are not viable: “The greatest risk for this project is the high cost to transport wood from dispersed sources to a single storage site. Transporting wet wood is significantly more time and energy-intensive than leaving it in the forest. Logistics greatly impact project viability, even if the price of carbon is high.” And, “the carbon containment value of burying large volumes of wood may be offset partially or totally by the carbon released from the soils when excavating a storage pit.” Despite this, as MIT Technology Review noted, Merritt Jenkins, Kodama’s co-founder and chief executive, says they plan to earn revenue from their forest thinning work, as well as by selling usable timber and carbon credits from its burial projects. Forbes summed up the potential benefits for Kodama and its investors: Along with the [venture capital] seed money, Kodama has already received $1.1 million in grants from California’s forest fire agency and others, as well as purchase commitments for the carbon credits tied to the first 400 tonnes of trees it buries. On the open market, those credits should fetch $200 a tonne. Eventually, Kodama wants to cut down and bury more than 5,000 tonnes of trees a year. If you want to cut down trees and pelletise them to burn in place of coal, there are tax credits for that too. But not, as of now, for burying them. Chop Down Forests to Save the Planet? Maybe Not as Crazy as it Sounds, Forbes, 28 July 2023 So, we can conclude the idea is don’t use the wood, don’t recycle it and don’t allow it to enrich the environment, simply cut trees down and bury them. Does it sound crazy to you? We have a crisis but it’s not a climate crisis. Green policies are killing people, economies and, increasingly, the planet. The goal to reduce carbon emissions is a scam to enable the rich to become richer off the backs of the poor. The Investors Kodama Systems, based in the Sierra Nevada foothills town of Sonora, has been operating in stealth mode since it was founded in the summer of 2021, MIT Technology Review wrote. “Stealth mode”? Is that another way of saying Kodama has been illegally logging and then burying the evidence? If so, the illegal loggers have since raised millions. In December 2022, Kodama announced that it had raised $6.6 million in a Series Seed funding round co-led by leading climate-technology investors Breakthrough Energy Ventures and Congruent Ventures. Kodama has additionally received a business development grant from California’s forestry and fire protection services CAL FIRE to develop site connectivity and automation for forest thinning, and a carbon removal research and development grant from Frontier Climate for a biomass storage pilot project in partnership with the Yale Carbon Containment Lab. Breakthrough Energy Ventures (“BEV”) was founded by Bill Gates and is backed by many of the world’s top business leaders, BEV has raised more than $2 billion in committed capital to support cutting-edge companies that are leading the world to net-zero emissions. BEV is a purpose-built investment firm that is seeking to invest, launch and scale global companies that will eliminate greenhouse gas emissions throughout the economy as soon as possible. Congruent Ventures is a leading early-stage venture firm focused on partnering with entrepreneurs to build companies addressing climate and sustainability challenges. Congruent is one of the most active US investors in climate. Its portfolio represents companies that will “help to decarbonise” every sector of the economy – energy, fleet electrification, farming, new food products, sustainable aviation fuels, manufacturing, and more. In April 2023, it had more than $700 million in assets under management. Frontier Climate was founded by Stripe, Alphabet, Shopify, Meta, McKinsey and tens of thousands of businesses using Stripe Climate. Frontier aims to act as the middleman between buyers and sellers of carbon removal. What this means in simple terms is buyers decide how much they want to spend on carbon removal each year, Frontier aggregates the buyers’ budgets and then pays suppliers to remove the carbon. MIT Technology Review reported that on 15 December Stripe revealed it would provide a $250,000 research grant to Kodama and Yale Carbon Containment Lab as part of a broader carbon removal announcement. That grant will support a pilot effort to bury waste biomass harvested from California forests in the Nevada desert and study “how well it prevents the release of greenhouse gases that drive climate change.” Stripe also agreed to purchase about 415 tonnes of carbon dioxide eventually sequestered by Kodama for another $250,000, if that proof-of-concept project achieves certain benchmarks. For the last several years, Stripe has pre-purchased tonnes of carbon dioxide that start-ups aim to eventually draw out of the air and permanently sequester, in an effort to help build up a carbon removal industry. Let’s Keep the Trees and Get Rid of the Billionaires Even scientists who have been bought off or indoctrinated with the “climate crisis” ideology have had enough of the billionaires’ antics. Some have called for a shareholder-based carbon tax. The wealthiest 10 per cent in the USA are the source of 40 per cent of US national greenhouse gas emissions, they say. And, the wealthiest 1 per cent of households are responsible for between 15 per cent and 17 per cent of emissions. And increasingly, climate activists are setting their sights on the 1 per cent. Billionaires’ lifestyles are unsustainable, billionaires are bad for the planet they say. We may agree for different reasons but we do agree that billionaires are bad for the planet. Global News: Climate activists pivot to targeting the ultra-wealthy, 30 August 2023 (2 mins) Featured image: Cutting down trees can lead to negative effects on the ecosystem, Sciencing, 30 May 2023

The Reserve Bank is raising rates to send enough people with a mortgage broke so that on average Australians stop spending money. The RBA hopes that will bring down inflation. They don't mention that the RBA caused inflation by creating $500 billion out of thin air to compensate for the government's COVID lockdowns. The RBA either doesn't know what it's doing and needs to be dismantled and the CEO fired, or it does know what it's doing and definitely needs to be dismantled and CEO criminally charged.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/nih-initiative-dentists-push-hpv-vaccines/? The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research awarded over $685,000 to HealthPartners Institute to test strategies for getting dentists to recommend the human papillomavirus vaccine to children and young adults ages 11-26, documents obtained by Children's Health Defense via a Freedom of Information Act request revealed. The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) awarded over $685,000 to HealthPartners Institute to test strategies for getting dentists to recommend the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to children and young adults ages 11-26, documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD) via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request revealed. The NIDCR operates under the government’s taxpayer-funded National Institutes of Health (NIH). The HealthPartners study is being conducted three years after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) added prevention of oropharyngeal cancer, a form of head and neck cancer, to a growing list of indications for the HPV vaccine — despite a lack of clinical evidence to support the claim. Dentists remain generally reluctant to recommend or administer the vaccine to their patients, studies show. The NIDCR funding covers the first two years of a six-year, $3.5 million proposal for the healthcare nonprofit to experiment with training dental providers to deliver scripted messages to their patients about why they should get the HPV vaccine. HealthPartners will then run a clinical trial in 21 dental clinics to determine whether the training and messages lead more dental providers to recommend the vaccine, and more patients to take it. The grant is one of nearly 50 identified by CHD in June — totaling more than $40 million — awarded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to universities, healthcare systems and public health departments to increase HPV vaccine uptake among adolescents. The NIDCR is the latest of several HHS sub-agencies to fund behavior modification research aimed at providers and patients in order to increase vaccine uptake. Why would dentists be charged with recommending the HPV vaccine? Dentists are uniquely positioned to promote the HPV vaccine because they tend to have more regular contact with young patients than other healthcare providers, the HealthPartners proposal states. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry all recommend that dental providers promote HPV vaccination — but most dental providers don’t see vaccine promotion as part of dentistry. HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the U.S. Most people will get the infection at some point in their lives, but more than 90% of infections clear on their own with no residual health consequences on clinical follow-up. High-risk HPV types can cause cervical cell abnormalities that are precursors to cancer, however, HPV infection is not the sole risk factor for cervical cancer. Regular pap screening has been found to reduce the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer among women by at least 80%. Merck’s Gardasil 9 — the only HPV vaccine marketed in the U.S. — is a widely used vaccine commonly administered to teens and young adults before they are sexually active to protect against nine of more than 200 strands of HPV that can be sexually transmitted later in life. Despite Merck marketing Gardasil as a vaccine that protects against some forms of cancer, clinical trials for Gardasil did not test whether the vaccine protected against any cancer — only whether it had efficacy against the indicated strains of HPV. Gardasil has been associated with a number of serious adverse events. Some of the signature impacts observed following HPV vaccination include permanently disabling autoimmune and neurological conditions such as postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), fibromyalgia and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. More than 80 lawsuits against Merck now pending in federal courts allege the drugmaker fast-tracked Gardasil through the FDA’s approval process and deceptively conducted clinical trials to mask serious side effects and exaggerate the vaccine’s effectiveness. In June 2020, the FDA added the prevention of oropharyngeal and other head and neck cancers to the list of indications for the HPV vaccine under the “accelerated approval licensure pathway.” That pathway allows treatments to be approved before clinical data demonstrating benefit exists, based on early clinical predictions that the treatment will likely produce a benefit. Later, if a clinical benefit is never found, the FDA “can seek withdrawal” of the drug from the market. According to the HealthPartners grant proposal, HPV is the leading cause of oropharyngeal cancers in the U.S., However, the references cited to support that claim are from 2014 — and they don’t appear to support the claim. The CDC estimates 70% of oropharyngeal cancers in the U.S. are “thought to be” caused by HPV, and qualifies even that claim by adding, “It is unclear if having HPV alone is enough to cause oropharyngeal cancers.” There is no evidence that the HPV vaccine prevents oropharyngeal cancers, but some trials have found that it does have efficacy against vaccine-type oral strains of HPV. Top NIH-funded Merck consultants in the field, like Noel Brewer, Ph.D. — who developed and promotes the “announcement approach” to increasing vaccine uptake — have long looked to expand HPV vaccination into settings outside of primary care. On that basis, the HealthPartners study aims to change dental providers’ behavior so they consistently recommend the HPV vaccine to their patients. Dr. Brad Rindal, a dentist, and Patricia Mabry, Ph.D., a clinical psychologist, are co-leading the study. The proposal falls within HHS’ mission to understand the mechanisms of behavior change in order to develop methods of “experimental manipulation or intervention” with providers and patients that can help it meet its targets in various aspects of public health. HHS, through the NIH, has been funding behavioral studies to assess and influence providers’ willingness to recommend and administer the HPV vaccine in order to increase rates of vaccine uptake since shortly after the vaccine was first licensed in 2006. Study design explicitly waives informed consent for patients In the study, a team of researchers from HealthPartners — which provides healthcare, coverage, research and education to 1.8 million plan members — will train providers, teaching them about the relationship between the HPV vaccine and the risk of oropharyngeal cancer. Trained providers also will receive scripts for use in patient conversations tailored to “reduce fear” that such conversations will negatively impact provider-patient relationships. They also will learn how to refer their patients to a vaccine scheduler. Researchers will then measure changes in provider behavior through direct provider reporting — they press a button in their office when they make a recommendation — and follow-up surveys. Patients or patient parents or guardians will receive follow-up survey calls after the office visits to assess how effective the provider communication was. Researchers will measure changes in patient behavior by assessing how many patients receive initial and follow-up doses of the HPV vaccine within 30 days of their office visit. In the first two years of the study — funded by the initial grant — the team will develop and pilot test their training and scripts. Their control group will receive patient education brochures and untailored scripts and their intervention group will receive the training and the tailored scripts. In the next phase, they will test the efficacy of these interventions in clinic-randomized trials, comparing the control and intervention groups. Twenty-one HealthPartners Dental Group clinics and their providers will participate. Patients 11-26 years old who go to HealthPartners dental clinics and whose electronic health records indicate they have not initiated or completed the HPV vaccine series will be automatically enrolled in the study without their knowledge. HealthPartners estimates there will be approximately 8,000 qualifying visits with HPV unvaccinated patients. Verbal informed consent will be obtained for participation in the post-intervention patient/parent phone survey. The patients will not otherwise be informed of the study. The study requests a waiver of informed consent for patients by arguing that the dental providers will only be making recommendations already endorsed by the CDC, the American Cancer Society and the National HPV Roundtable, which is a joint venture of the CDC and the American Cancer Society. “Therefore,” they state, “the recommendations conform to current standards of care and don’t present a risk to patients that exceed the risks that patients assume when they seek care within any healthcare system focused on disease prevention through vaccination promotion.” They also argue that the research “would not be feasible without such a waiver” because it would bias the provider involvement and patient response. They add that patients sign a HIPAA authorization form that allows them to opt out of using health data for research purposes and that they will be certain to check that list. Finally, they note that “patients can elect not to pursue vaccination despite the recommendation of the dental care provider” — even though the intervention is designed to change their behavior so they don’t make such an election. Merck, federal public health agencies, and WHO looking to grow market for HPV shots Merck’s Gardasil was first licensed in 2006 for use in girls and women ages 9-26 to prevent four high-risk strains of HPV. The FDA in 2009 expanded the license for use in males ages 9-26 for the prevention of genital warts and in 2011, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended it for routine use in boys. In 2014, the FDA approved Gardasil 9, designed to protect against 9 HPV strains, for use in the prevention of HPV-related cervical, vaginal and vulvar cancers in females and HPV-related anogenital lesions and anal cancers in males and females. The FDA also expanded the age range of potential HPV vaccines to males and females between the ages of 9 and 45. Early marketing strategies focused on promoting the drug as guarding against HPV, a sexually transmitted disease. But in 2016, as vaccination rates lagged, the CDC recommended that doctors stress the HPV vaccine’s cancer-prevention benefits, rather than talking about STDs as a way to get more parents to vaccinate younger kids. And in 2020, it added oropharyngeal and other head and neck cancers to the list. Over the last several years, HHS has invested tens of millions of dollars in research to get U.S. HPV vaccine uptake numbers to HHS’ “healthy people” target rates of 80% of children and teens vaccinated by 2030. Meanwhile, Merck has expanded its ad campaigns beyond teenagers to target parents of young children and adults. In 2020, the WHO set a goal of vaccinating 90% of teenage girls by 2030. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, is currently launching a series of campaigns to vaccinate tens of millions of girls in Africa, following similar campaigns in India and Indonesia. Last week Merck announced its third-quarter earnings from Gardasil were up 13% to $2.9 billion. Allied Market Research predicts the global HPV vaccine market — in which Merck is the primary player, although GSK also markets its Cervarix outside of the U.S. — will grow to $10.8 billion.

https://expose-news.com/2023/11/01/is-jordan-petersons-arc-wef-2-0/ The Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC) which Jordan Peterson has said is an alternative to the apocalyptic World Economic Forum, has just held it’s inaugural conference at the O2 arena in London. The ARC (Alliance for Responsible Citizenship) conference that was attended by over 1500 people, set out to be an alternative to gatherings such as Davos and the World Economic Forum. However, the ARC according to David Icke, is blatant Pied Piper controlled opposition full of fake ‘alternatives’, investment bankers, globalists and elitists, and funded by the owners of fake ‘alternative’ GB News. Hijackers of the REAL alternative media now on public display. This is ten months after Peterson announced on the Joe Rogan show on January the 27th 2023 that he’d been working with a group of people in the UK, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the U.S. to organise a series of questions about how we might want to conduct ourselves and what we might want to happen collectively as we move forward in to the future. Peterson, said that “from the level of the individual all the way up to the level of the universal collective, Peterson claimed to want to know what kind of planet do we want to inhabit? Sounds a bit WEF to me. The ARC Peterson’s vision for ARC “it is existentially perilous to insist upon the impending end of the world in this doomsaying manner — lest the ensuing panicked tyranny produce exactly the result that is, in principle, most feared.” Peterson uses a lot of religious themes and keywords, starting with the ARC obviously, but he said this is not something he wanted to bring across in the ARC narrative. “We at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship, we at ARC do not believe that humanity is necessarily and inevitably teetering on the brink of apocalyptic disaster. We do not believe that we are beings primarily motivated by lust for power and the desire to dominate. We do not regard ourselves or our fellow citizens as destructive forces living in an alien relationship to the pristine and pure natural world. We posit instead that men and women of faith and decisiveness made in the image of God.” says Jordan “give em hell” Peterson. Who clearly failed in keeping religious, apocalyptic themes out of his monologue. Organically Grown. Peterson imagines that we might be cynical as he only met with “conservative people” who were just echoing back to him what he wanted to hear. That’s actually not true, he argues, and insists that the group came about because lots of people that he met were “disenchanted liberals of leftists who were not left enough to be enamoured of the communist regimes, or who had also been cancelled and mobbed by the new woke tyrants.” These new members of the ARC previously “felt like voices crying in the wilderness” according to Peterson, who said this was reiterated in about 6 countries. “Every place we go people are saying the same thing, claims Peterson, “They’re appalled by what’s happening on the culture war front, especially what’s happening to the radical left, they can’t believe that they’re making the incursions that they’re making and they feel absolutely isolated in their attempts to do anything about it.” “why aren’t people coming together,?” he asked himself, let’s say, “why aren’t they coming together in some international manner to discuss exactly this problem. Is there no overarching structure of communication that would make that possible?” then he thought, “maybe I should organise such a thing and bring people together for a conference, somewhere in Europe, or maybe in North America” bring people who are centrally inclined, and that would be the vast majority of people, together so they can share what they’ve done in their own country that might be extremely useful.” Did you Jordan? Meet the New Boss, Same as The Old Boss Basically what Peterson would like us to believe is that this group just happened organically, he travelled the world after got speaking to a few people and the ARC organisation, all came together. This is just too unbelievable, especially when we then look at who are aboard the ARC’s organising committee proves the point that it’s is Meet the New Boss, Same as the old boss. according to amazing Polly, (who actually does do some amazing research!) SEE ADVISORY-BOARD Establishment Take just three members of the ARCs organising committee: Bjorn Longboard, still believes in climate change and thinks we need to do something about it, it is just slightly different from how it is being sold to us now. Robin Batterman is from Net zero Australia, and as we all know Net Zero is the World Economic Forum’s, Climate Change and Sustainable Developement agenda. Riva Melissa Tez has plans to build a digital city, with crypto, but a real city much like a “Smart City” In fact the members are very much established establishment, here is also an organising committee member from Globol ROBO. and a WEF young global leader, Dan Cranshaw, and many from Australia, including two former prime ministers Tony Abbott and John Howard as well as a deputy Prime Minister. It is all the same as the Great Reset, just with a different story, as Peterson said, “we need a new story”, according to Amazing Polly, who has researched the members in depth. UK Members Just from the UK, board members include 3 House of Lords members, Stroud, Glasman, Morrissey. 2 x GBnews, McCormick chairman, Paul Marshall (Marshall Wace) owner of GBNews who is also one of the directors of the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC) who has also brought his musician son Winston Marshall from the band Mumford and sons on board the ARC. Baroness Philippa Stroud,is co-founder and CEO of the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship and seems to be a spokesperson for them and promotes the organisation alongside Peterson. The Baroness, is also a Member of the House of Lords, and Chair of the Social Metrics Commission. and Co-Founder and Chief Executive of the Centre for Social Justice. She served as Special Adviser to the Rt. Hon. Iain Duncan Smith MP from 2010-15 and also to the Prime Minister from 2012. Legatum is ARC Prior to this, she was the CEO of the Legatum Institute, In fact there a lot of people from an organisation called Legatum, and what is apparent is that the ARC is Legatum. Alan McCormick Partner of the investment group Legatum. who with his partners founded and now plays a governance role for organisations including the END Fund, Freedom Fund, Luminos Fund, the Legatum Center for Entrepreneurship at MIT and the Legatum Institute Foundation. (source) He is also the co-creator of the Legatum Prosperity Index and Chairman of GB News. Legatum is also headed up by and is said to be owned by Christopher Chandler, a New Zealand born businessman and founder of the Dubai-based investment firm, which also provides funding for Paul Marshall’s UK media channel GB News. ARC has a number of ties to the Legatum Institute. In addition to ARC CEO Philippa Stroud’s prior role at Legatum, the Legatum Group’s current CEO, Mark Alan Stoleson, is also listed in Companies House documents as a person with significant control in ARC.14 The Financial Times described The Legatum Institute as the “intellectual heart” of a “‘hard’ Brexit.”15 The Legatum Institute reportedly receives a significant portion of its funding — £3.9m according to a 2017 article — from the Legatum Foundation Limited. DeSmog mapped the connections between the Legatum Institute and the “Brexiteers’ brain,”16 Shanker Singham, and how this provided privileged access to the UK government in order to push a hard Brexit. Singham was at one point a policy expert for the US-based Heartland Institute, which has received at least $676,500 from ExxonMobil since 1998.17 A search of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ)’s Offshore Leaks Database reveals the Legatum Foundation Limited has ties to both Bermuda and the UAE, and lists two directors also associated with ARC.18 (Source). The Alliance For Responsible Citizenship on Companies House. Companies house also has the ARC listed from back in 2016, and lists a previous name Prosperity UK 2017 Limited from the 12th December 2016 and changed to the name the Alliance of Responsible Citizenship in January. As you can see Paul Marshall is listed as one of the owners along with Alan McCormick. What this means is that the ARC is not a new venture and certainly was not grown organically through Jordan Peterson jaunting around the world and talking to people. Peterson is simply a spokesperson for the ARC source Who is Paul Marshall? Paul Marshall and Fossil Fuels Paul Marshall is the chairman and chief investment officer of Marshall Wace, a London-based hedge fund that he co-founded in 1997. Marshall Wace is now one of the world’s largest hedge funds – an investment vehicle that bets on rising and falling share prices – with around $63 billion (£51.9 billion) in assets under management. According to DeSmog’s analysis of Marshall Wace’s filings with the US financial regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), his fund owns shares worth $2.2 billion (£1.8 billion) in fossil fuel firms. Marshall Wace reports a $213 million (£175.6 million) shareholding in the oil and gas supermajor Chevron, as well as stakes in Shell, Equinor, and 109 other fossil fuel companies and the value of Marshall Wace’s stake in Chevron, the world’s eighth largest fossil fuel company, has more than doubled from $105 million (£86.6 million) to $213 million (£175.6 million) in two years, even though its total number of shares and equity options has increased over that period by just 35 percent. Marshall Wace held shares in 112 fossil fuel companies as of June 2023. Two years earlier, in June 2021, the hedge fund held shares in 50 of these firms. The value of the stakes in these 50 firms almost trebled over the period, from $565.4 million (£466.1 million) to $1.4 billion (£1.15 billion). Paul Marshall and the Tory Party Marshall has donated £3,250 to Michael Gove in 2016. Gove is a member of ARC, and spoke today at the conference, saying “you will find that there are major institutions within the corporate world – the decisions that they have taken have enriched them.” Hmm, you don’t say Michael!? source Paul Marshall and GB News Marshall also donated £500,000 to the Tories in 2019, no doubt to help his good buddy Boris Johnson in the 2019 election where he was not really trying to campaign and was reported as hiding in fridges and not turning up for debates. His new position should not be a surprise to us. Also within the investigation carried out in May DeSmog found that one in three of Paul Marshalls GB News presenters had spread climate science denial on air in 2022, while more than half had attacked climate action. GB News presenters have used their platforms to urge the UK to “drill, baby, drill” for more coal, oil and gas. You will remember that Laurence Fox from the Reclaim Party, was sacked from his position of at Paul Marshalls GBNews, so what a surprise that he was invited along to the ARC Conference today. Isn’t that just lovely? Every single person at Jordan Peterson’s ‘The Arc’ is completely controlled opposition and or a sell out, says Unity News Net Author, Miri AF who always has well research entertaining reads, points out in her article “Here Comes the Flood, All aboard the ARC” “We’ve all heard it and said it a million times but it deserves one big resonant repeat… “It’s a big club and we’re not in it.“ That club she is referring to includes “Anti-establishment heroes” like Laurence Fox, Andrew Bridgen, and Jordan Peterson are in exactly the same club as Matt Hancock, Boris Johnson, Justin Trudeau et al. The only difference is, they’re scripted in order to appeal to a different demographic – the “dissidents”, us – but ultimately, are funnelling us all in exactly the same direction as Hancock and co are the normies.” according to Miri Miri claims that this is why “all the supposedly independent anti-establishment figures and platforms interlink, and why, ultimately, they all coalesce with the same establishment agenda (and its money), as is irrevocably clear by the names listed on ARC’s Advisory Board. You’ve got “anti-establishment rebels” like Peterson and Perry, right there with as-establishment-as-it gets Tony Abbott (former PM of Australia), various members of the House of Lords and assorted other billionaires and big cheeses.” The ARC is WEF 2.0 There is a connection between these “supposedly independent, unconnected initiatives” which includes GB News, The Reclaim Party, The Bad Law Project, and Democracy 3.0 – and all names prominently associated with these projects, including Laurence Fox, Andrew Bridgen and Dan Wootton (source). They are nothing but funnels to take us all in the same direction – to WEF 2.0, the ARC. and the“WEF has intentionally been made very prominent as an institution, and become very publicly villainised, with its most famous representative quite literally (and intentionally) resembling a cartoon villain – so that we can be manipulated into feeling we’ve won an important victory when the WEF is inevitably dismantled (Klaus Schwab is very elderly and hasn’t appointed a successor for when he dies) and is replaced by ARC… which will, in reality, function in exactly the same way (source). As David Icke Says, it is “the time when the REAL alternative media must step forward and reclaim the momentum for the celeb fakes and frauds who have hijacked the arena” It will come as a surprise to many people just who from their fave celebs are in fake frauds.” Particularly Peterson who has concocted such a huge story” It is time to Give em Hell!

https://www.newstarget.com/2023-10-31-jeffrey-prather-michael-flynn-israel-stood-down.html Intelligence analysts Jeffrey Prather, Gen. Michael Flynn both agree: Israel STOOD DOWN to allow Hamas to unleash terror Retired Special Operations Soldier, former DIA Intelligence Collector and ex-DEA Special Agent Jeffrey Prather appeared with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, this week to discuss the situation in Israel, which both Prather and Gen. Michael Flynn agree had to have ordered a stand down that allowed Hamas to unleash terror on October 7 inside its borders. Israel's borders, which are arguably the most impenetrable in the world, combined with the intelligence and military strength of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) render it an impossibility that Hamas was somehow able to sneak by with nobody noticing. "I confirmed right after it happened that Israel's so-called 'intelligence failure' could not be an intelligence failure," Prather told Adams – watch the interview below. "Anybody who knows Israel and the border – which American taxpayers paid for, by the way – there are triple, multiple redundant systems; it is highly fortified; it is highly censored; there are troops and drills every day. And what I said early on is that any intelligence professional who says that this is an intelligence failure by Israel is either lying or a fool – and I stand by that." (Related: Did you know that Israel created Hamas back in the '70s to counteract Yasser Arafat?) Netanyahu admitted Hamas attack was a false flag when he called it "Israel's 9/11" It is one thing for Prather to say these things, and entirely another for Gen. Flynn, whom Prather described as "a much bigger fish in the patriot movement" – and one who served in former President Donald Trump's cabinet. "He was very courageous and said it had to be some kind of stand down," Prather says of Flynn, recognizing that Flynn has a much higher profile and will likely pay a bigger price, especially among conservatives who tend to "support Israel," believing it in its current geopolitical form to represent God's chosen people. One thing that Prather really finds interesting about this whole thing is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's admission that the Hamas attack is "Israel's 9/11," especially in light of all that has been coming out recently about the false flag nature of America's 9/11 attack. "We have since learned about the FBI and CIA involvement in our 9/11," Prather explained. "We have learned about the Israeli art students who were infiltrated by Mossad, by the FBI; we learned that the FBI was not allowed to investigate the terrorists who were learning how to fly planes in Arizona, and were not allowed to investigate them." "We know that the deep state, which is really the intelligence community, planned and allowed 9/11 to happen. If Netanyahu makes a statement that this is Israel's 9/11, then the natural question to ask for real patriots is: well, were they in on it? And the clear answer for me, confirmed by Gen. Flynn, is yes. He said that his intelligence circle was infiltrated – he went out really far on a limb." Dr. Francis Boyle has also spoken out about this whole thing, stating that what Israel is now doing to the people of Gaza in response to the Hamas attack is akin to what the Nazis did to Jews during World War II. "So now Israel is doing to the Palestinians what the Third Reich did to the Jews," Adams stated, quoting what Dr. Boyle recently told him in a conversation. "And that all of this was predicated upon a lie, which is that there was an intelligence failure and that somehow Hamas overran the most elaborate, most complex, most well-funded security wall in the world." The raging conflict in the Middle East has only just begun. Learn more at Prophecy.news.