Search Results

https://telestai.substack.com/p/sabrina-wallace-manifesto?utm_source=podcast-email%2Csubstack&publication_id=2002274&post_id=157471306&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=play_card_play_button&r=3zgqx&triedRedirect=true

A courageous whistleblower in Ukraine - on the verge of exposing a vast child trafficking and adrenochrome network tied to elite politicians and Hollywood celebrities - has been assassinated in a brutal car bomb attack. Just days before he was set to testify against President Zelensky and the Kiev regime, his voice was silenced. But the truth doesn’t die so easily. Who wanted him silenced? What explosive secrets was he about to expose? And just how far does this conspiracy reach? All signs point straight to the highest levels of power - from Washington, D.C., to the heart of Hollywood. Stay with us as we expose the shocking truths the media is desperate to bury.

They've been lying to you about death. And the proof? It's sitting in a declassified CIA document. I'm really thankful you're here with us on this big journey of life. Your support would means the world to me. If you enjoy the content, I would highly appreciate it please to turn on the notifications bell, subscribe, like and share the content. Thank you 🙏 Chapters 00:00  - Introduction 01:15  - The CIA’s Secret Research 05:20  - The Gateway Experience—Escaping the Physical Realm 09:26  - Energy and Immortality 14:00  - The Illusion of Time 18:04  - The Final Moment—What Happens at Death? 23:15  - The Government’s Role—Why Hide This? 27:56  - Breaking Free—Reclaiming Your Consciousness 32:55  - What They Don’t Want You to Know 38:00  - The Last Secret

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-government-ntp-end-wireless-radiation-studies-biological-effects/ The National Toxicology Program’s follow-up research on the biological effects of wireless radiation faced a lack of interest from regulatory agencies and technical challenges after its $30 million 2018 study found evidence of cancer and DNA damage, according to John Bucher, Ph.D. Editor’s note: This is the first in a two-part series investigating why the U.S. government ended studies on the biological effects of wireless radiation. In January 2024, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) announced it had no plans to further study the effects of cellphone radiofrequency radiation (RFR) on human health — even though the program’s own $30 million study , which took about 10 years to complete in 2018, found “ clear evidence ” of cancer and DNA damage. Why did the NTP shut down the studies? In an exclusive interview with The Defender, John Bucher, Ph.D. , discussed what likely led to the demise of follow-up studies despite the NTP’s findings of DNA damage in rats exposed to 2G and 3G cellphone radiation. Bucher is a former senior scientist in the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) NTP division. NIEHS is one of the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) 27 institutes and centers . After starting in 1983 as a NIEHS staff toxicologist, Bucher served as NTP’s associate director from 2007 to early 2018. He retired in April 2021 but maintains volunteer status. He has been highly involved with NTP’s research on wireless radiation. Bucher named a “convergence” of issues that likely led to NTP’s decision to stop studying the biological effects of wireless RFR . He told The Defender on Wednesday: “We were having technical problems, there was really no interest on the part of the regulatory agencies for us to continue these studies, the technical expertise and the drivers behind getting the work done were retired, and there’s competing priorities — always competing priorities in a program like that.” Those factors likely fueled the decision to halt the research, he said. “I’m not saying that I wouldn’t have reached the same decision had I been there.” Bucher added: “I think I would’ve pushed harder [to keep studying wireless radiation’s biological effects], but I can’t say that the overall decision would’ve been different had I been able to influence it.” As NTP’s former associate director, Bucher oversaw the program’s two-year study of 2G and 3G cellphone radiation that found “clear evidence” of malignant heart tumors in male rats, “some evidence” of malignant brain tumors in male rats, and “some evidence” of benign, malignant and complex combined adrenal gland tumors in male rats. He was a collaborator on the study’s 2018 technical reports of its findings. He also was co-author of a 2019 genetic analysis of some of the rats and mice used in the two-year study. The 2019 study also found a link between wireless RFR exposure and DNA damage. According to its website , NTP is an “interagency program composed of, and supported by, three government agencies within the Department of Health and Human Services.” Those agencies include the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) National Center for Toxicological Research, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and NIH’s NIEHS. After the results from NTP’s two-year study were published in 2018, NIEHS scientists undertook more research “to better understand” some of the findings from the 2018 study, according to NTP’s cellphone radiation website , which stated: “The goals of this new research were to determine the impact of RFR exposure on behavior and stress, conduct real-time physiological monitoring, including evaluation of heart rate, investigate whether RFR exposure induces heating, and evaluate further whether RFR exposure causes DNA damage.” However, in January 2024, NTP announced it was abandoning the research because it was “technically challenging and more resource-intensive than expected.” In April 2024, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) filed requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) with NIH to obtain records and communications related to the halted studies to find out why the government shut the studies down and what results, if any, the studies had generated. FDA, FCC were uninterested in NTP’s results Bucher said he did not know who exactly made the decision to stop the research. However, both he and former NTP Associate Director Brian Berridge told The Defender that NTP’s research portfolio was under the governance of the NTP Executive Committee , so the decision may have involved that committee. According to the committee’s website, its members are the heads, or their designees, of the FDA, NIEHS, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Cancer Institute, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Consumer Product Safety Commission, U.S. Department of Defense, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Bucher and Berridge said the final decision-maker would likely have been Rick Woychik, Ph.D. , who currently directs NTP and NIEHS. Bucher provided detailed information about the “headwinds that go into making a decision like this,” starting with why NTP began studying RFR in the first place. Most of the studies NTP conducted while Bucher was NTP’s day-to-day operations director were undertaken because another federal agency asked NTP to do so, he said. “We operated pretty much on a basis of receiving nominations from other agencies for the work that we ended up doing,” he said. “The original radiofrequency radiation nomination came from the Food and Drug Administration, which … has jurisdiction over the biological aspects of harms … from radiofrequency radiation.” The FDA nominated RFR as an NTP study topic in 1999. NTP soon after began designing its $30 million study that would finally be published in 2018. Bucher said studying RFR was “kind of a departure for NTP because we were primarily a chemical-oriented cancer and toxicology organization. We had done some studies with things other than chemicals … but to move into an area that was sort of at the intersection of physics and biology was new for us — and it required a fair amount of convincing of staff that we could actually take this on.” NTP worked with the “absolute top engineering firms in the world” to design and monitor the RFR exposure chambers used in the study, Bucher said. “We had an exposure facility built in a laboratory in Chicago where we performed these studies.” He added, “All the government people involved in setting up those studies are now fully retired … The one person that’s left following up on any RFR-related activities is, I guess you would say, of lower influence.” In 2017, Bucher and his NTP colleagues were reporting the initial findings to the relevant regulatory agencies, including the FDA and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which were “polite but not that interested,” he said. He added: “This was the beginning of the first Trump administration. I think they could see the handwriting on the wall that science wasn’t a high priority, and it would be a difficult task to actually come up with [RFR exposure] regulations that could get through any kind of a process.” The FCC, which sets the legal limits for wireless radiation hasn’t updated its guidelines since 1996. The FCC hasn’t complied with a court-ordered mandate to explain how the agency determined that its current guidelines adequately protect humans and the environment against the harmful effects of exposure to wireless radiation. Smaller exposure chambers were problematic Bucher confirmed that when he was in charge of the NTP division of NIEHS, he funded the facilities for subsequent studies. The goal of those studies wasn’t to fully replicate the 2018 study. Instead, the follow-up studies were smaller “mechanistic” studies to understand biological changes related to RFR that could be causing cancer. By “mechanistic,” Bucher meant the researchers would look for activation of or mutations in genes known to be involved in cancer or the genetic toxicity effects the researchers saw in the 2018 study. “We would be looking primarily at changes in gene expression in the brain or other target organs, and then relate those to what we know about processes involved in cancer.” So they designed new RFR exposure chambers because the old chambers from the 2018 study were located in a lab that NTP no longer had a contract with — and the chambers’ electrical parts were wearing out and needed to be replaced. “They were just dismantled because they were taking up space and we were paying for it. So we created smaller chambers … in a contract laboratory where we had an active contract,” Bucher said. Unfortunately, the researchers encountered technical difficulties in getting small exposure chambers to work. “Building them was not a problem,” Bucher said, “but getting them to actually work in a way that would reproduce what was done in the larger chambers in the earlier study was challenging — more challenging than we expected.” The researchers made some progress “but then COVID hit and things just became difficult, so that project sort of languished for a long time.” ‘By the time we would come out with the next generation of studies’ industry would be on to something else The research faced other challenges, too, Bucher said. “The government has always been way behind the technologies that are being developed in the telecommunications industries.” NTP’s 2018 study involved 2G and 3G. “So we would’ve had to start from ground zero to try to keep up with 5G.” Bucher said: “One of the frustrations that we all had was that we were one or two technologies behind, and the relevance of the results applied only to those wavelengths and frequencies that were still incorporated in 4G and may still be incorporated in 5G, but they wouldn’t cover the entire spectrum.” By the time 4G was rolled out, NTP’s RFR researchers were already “losing the battle” with regard to galvanizing the interest of the FDA and FCC and overcoming technical challenges. “These studies take so long that by the time we would come out with the next generation of studies, they [the telecommunications industry] would be on to something else,” he said. “It was very frustrating.” So it didn’t come as a huge surprise to Bucher that NTP eventually decided to stop the research. Telecom industry should be doing this research ‘on their dime’ Bucher said he thinks it’s unfortunate that it falls on the government to study the biological effects of the telecommunication industry’s products. That research “is what the industry should be doing on their dime and using their expertise and their predictions as to where the technology is going.” A government-industry collaboration might be helpful, he said. “But to have it be government only — where we’re just basically guessing from trade publications as to where the field is going — is nuts.” When asked if he thought a different government agency might be better suited for studying RFR, Bucher said the FDA’s National Center for Toxicological Research has a laboratory in Arkansas that’s capable of doing this kind of work. It would be appropriate for the FDA to study RFR “because they’re the agency charged with making recommendations to the FCC with respect to the biological aspects of the need for regulation.” But it would be critical for the other FDA centers to commit to an acceptance of the study’s results before the results are available, he said. “We didn’t think this would be necessary in 1999 when NTP was asked to study RFR,” Bucher said. But when NTP’s study results came out in 2018, “the FDA put out statements that, let’s put it this way, they were very dismissive of the findings.” Even though it had been the very agency to ask NTP to study RFR, the FDA repudiated the study in November 2018, and in February 2020, released the unsigned literature review that criticized the study. Related articles in The Defender No More Research on Cellphone Radiation and Human Health, Government Says CHD Files FOIA Requests: Why Did Government Shut Down Studies on Cellphone Radiation and Cancer? How FDA Spins the Science on Cellphone Radiation and Human Health Risks For 50 Years Regulators Ignored Report Linking Wireless Radiation to 23 Chronic Diseases

Are there really 13 calendar months? Does the new year really start in January? Or do the orientation to 12 months and the beginning of the new year in January serve rather to keep us out of our natural rhythm? Why is our September considered the ninth month when Sept stands for seven? Oct stands for Eight. Nov stands for Nine. Dec stands for Ten.

https://expose-news.com/2025/02/19/bird-flu-they-are-re-running-the-covid-script/ The bird flu is a re-run of covid. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is basic pattern recognition.  The pandemic planners have a playbook; they used it for covid and now they are using it for bird flu; with one difference.  With covid, they targeted us directly.  With bird flu, they are targeting us indirectly through our food supply. It is currently being claimed that bird flu is widespread in wild birds worldwide and is causing outbreaks in poultry, dairy cows and cats , and has resulted in several human cases in the US , including a recent case in Wyoming.  By coincidence, yesterday, the US Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) gave conditional approval for an updated bird flu vaccine for poultry. An outbreak of bird flu at a farm in New Zealand in December resulted in the culling of almost 160,000 hens.  But, warned New Zealand’s Biosecurity Minister yesterday , a different strain of the flu was circulating globally and would likely arrive in New Zealand. At the end of January, GAVI “Vaccines Work” was delighted to announce that restrictions had been put in place in the UK to curb the spread of bird flu.  Almost 1.8 million farmed and captive birds have been culled in the past three months due to avian flu outbreaks across the UK. Reuters reported yesterday that there has been an outbreak of bird flu in Canada . And so, it goes on.  Countries’ pandemic-vaccine industries are moving in lockstep just as they did with covid.  In the following, Clayton Baker explains more about their pandemic playbook which they used for covid and are now using for bird flu.  “Learn it, and you can understand how to put an end to it,” he writes. Although he refers to the pandemic industry in the USA, similar can be applied worldwide. Bird Flu Is a Rerun of the Covid Playbook By Clayton J. Baker as published by Brownstone Institute Bird flu can be very confusing. This is true because, as is so often the case with our government, those who claim to be trying to solve the problem – our so-called “public health” and “pandemic preparedness” “experts” – are actually the ones who created the problem. What is worse, they are actively seeking to perpetuate it. In this brief article, my goal is to explain what is happening with H5N1 Bird flu in the clearest, most fundamental terms. I hope to make it so clear that all our elected officials can understand what is going on and therefore can take action to stop it. The key to understanding the current bird flu panic is this:  Bird flu is a complete rerun of the covid script.  There is just one twist: Last time, with covid, the pandemic-planning bioterrorists  directly  blackmailed us by taking away our civil rights, to coerce us to accept their unsafe and ineffective vaccines.  This time, with Bird flu, the pandemic planning bioterrorists are indirectly blackmailing us by targeting our food, to coerce us to accept more of their unsafe and ineffective vaccines into our food supply and those who supply it. Here is their playbook. Learn it, and you can understand how to put an end to it. Let’s review. What happened during covid?  1. Over many years, bioweapons scientists, under the guise of “pandemic preparedness,” genetically manipulated a bat coronavirus to be both transmissible and virulent in humans. In other words, they created a bioweapon. 2. Meanwhile, they also developed and patented technologies for vaccines against that same virus. In other words, they created the countermeasure to their bioweapon. 3. In late 2019, the laboratory-manipulated coronavirus bioweapon, SARS-CoV-2, was leaked from a laboratory.  4. While the countermeasure vaccines were rushed into production, “public health” authorities took advantage of the laboratory leak by denying its occurrence, while simultaneously coercing governments to impose lockdowns and other civil rights violations on the human population. 5. To perpetuate the lockdowns, “public health” authorities performed indiscriminate PCR testing for the virus among the population, knowing full well this would generate countless false positives. 6. The authorities used this excessive testing along with media-generated fear-mongering and governmental abuse of power, to prolong the lockdowns and the civil rights abuses. 7. The lockdowns and civil rights abuses were used to blackmail the population into mass acceptance of the vaccines into their own bodies, in exchange for a return to normal life. What is happening now, with H5N1 bird flu? 1. Over many years, bioweapons scientists, under the guise of “pandemic preparedness,” have genetically manipulated the H5N1 avian influenza virus to cross classes of animals and even become more transmissible to humans. In other words, they created a bioweapon. 2. Meanwhile, they also developed and patented technologies for vaccines against that same virus. In other words, they created the countermeasure to their bioweapon. 3. In early 2022, a lab-manipulated bird flu bioweapon  leaked  from the USDA Southeast Poultry Lab in Athens, Georgia. Multiple Bird flu leaks have also  occurred  from other laboratories. 4. While the countermeasure vaccines are being rushed into  production , “public health” authorities take advantage of these lab leaks by denying their occurrence, while simultaneously coercing our government to impose  mass slaughter of farm animals , creating  food shortages  for the human population. 5. To perpetuate the mass slaughter and worsen food shortages, “public health” authorities are performing indiscriminate PCR testing for the virus among the animal population and farmers, knowing full well this will generate countless false positives. 6. Authorities are using this excessive testing along with  media-generated fear-mongering  and governmental abuse of power, to prolong the mass slaughter of farm animals and the food shortages. 7. The mass slaughter of farm animals and resulting food shortages are being used to blackmail the population into mass acceptance of the vaccines in their food supply, in exchange for a return to normal life. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is basic pattern recognition. The “pandemic planners” are operating just like a moderately competent, if unimaginative, high school football coach. If you run a play, and it works, run it again. Keep running it until they stop it. How do we stop it? Here’s how: 1. End the brutal mass slaughter of poultry flocks immediately. This  disgusting, death-wish practice  is directly analogous to the deadly and unconstitutional human lockdowns during covid. It is also an act of biological terrorism. It traumatises farmers, wastes resources, creates food shortages, is inhumane in the extreme to animals and does nothing to stop the virus. Let the flocks develop natural immunity. Slaughtered flocks cannot develop natural immunity to a virus, just as locked-down human populations cannot either. Sound familiar? 2. End the indiscriminate PCR testing for Bird flu in animals and humans immediately. A positive PCR test is like the proverbial grand jury indictment – you can get one on a ham sandwich if you try hard enough. Willy-nilly PCR testing creates innumerable false positives, which fuels the fear porn and hysteria, paralyses decision-makers and promotes population-wide blackmail.  3. The USDA appears to be acting as a rogue agency. The USDA’s leadership needs to be thoroughly reviewed and, well, culled. All those attached to the pandemic preparedness industry, and all those perpetuating the fear-mongering, irresponsible mass PCR testing, mass slaughter of animals, etc. must be immediately removed from the agency. They represent not only a threat to animals and the food supply but to President Trump’s entire second term. 4. The personnel at the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) need a similar prompt and thorough overhaul.TheCDC, while somewhat chastened by President Trump’s executive order silencing Health and Human Services (“HHS”) agencies, and benefitting from the departure of former Director Mandy Cohen, is still led by Biden-era appointments whose past resumes raise serious doubt about their willingness to abandon the covid era “pandemic planning” model of public health. For example, acting director  Susan Monarez, PhD ’s biography shows multiple Deep State connections to the pandemic preparedness industry. Should she remain at the CDC? 5. The USDA Southeast Poultry Research Lab in Athens, Georgia, should be shut down and thoroughly investigated. 6. The  Kawaoka Bird flu laboratory  at the University of Wisconsin, which has been doing reckless gain-of-function research for decades, and which has had  multiple lab leaks , should be shut down and investigated as well. 7. Brooke Rollins, the new USDA Secretary, needs to be fully briefed on H5N1 Bird flu by honest experts who are not embedded in the pandemic preparedness industry. People such as Meryl Nass, MD, and Peter McCullough, MD and his team would both be excellent choices. 8. President Trump should follow through on his  2024 promise  to disband the redundant, Biden-created Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy (“OPPR”).Mr. Trump’s instinct was correct then, and it remains correct now. 9. The $590 million bird flu vaccine development contract to Moderna that the Biden administration approved a couple of days before President Trump’s inauguration should be cancelled.  10. The USDA’s reported “conditional approval” of a Bird flu vaccine with Zoetis should be cancelled. Bird flu vaccination in poultry flocks has  been demonstrated  in other countries to select for more virulent strains. Furthermore, the  CEO  of Zoetis has close ties to Pfizer, BlackRock and the  Gates Foundation , all well-established bad actors during the covid era. Beware, Mr. President. The “pandemic preparedness” racket isn’t as complicated as it seems. Once one comes to terms with the fact that  the arsonists are running the fire department  – as they have been demonstrated by DOGE to be doing in so many other areas of government as well – we can recognise what is actually happening and apply the necessary solutions. About the Author C.J. Baker is an internal medicine physician with a quarter century in clinical practice. He has held numerous academic medical appointments, and his work has appeared in many journals, including the Journal of the American Medical Association and the New England Journal of Medicine . From 2012 to 2018 he was Clinical Associate Professor of Medical Humanities and Bioethics at the University of Rochester.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/50-years-regulators-wireless-radiation-23-chronic-diseases The authors of a new report, posted Feb. 6, discuss how the U.S. Naval Medical Research Institute in 1971 issued a report that reviewed 2,311 scientific studies on the biological and health effects of EMR. They concluded the U.S. government has failed to protect the public from known harms. The U.S. government has known for over 50 years that wireless radiation is linked to 23 chronic diseases but has failed to protect the public from chronic wireless radiation exposure, according to the authors of a new report . Richard Lear and Camilla Rees posted their report on Feb. 6 as a preprint on ResearchGate. Lear and Rees are business executives and long-time health and environmental researchers. The report, which Rees called a “discussion and commentary” on published science related to wireless radiation’s biological impacts, is geared toward an everyday audience. It is not intended for publication in a peer-reviewed academic journal. Lear and Rees posted the report on ResearchGate to make it accessible to the public. On Feb. 14, Rees shared the paper with attendees of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine ’s annual conference in San Antonio, Texas, according to a press release . Miriam Eckenfels, director of Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) & Wireless called the report an “easy-to-understand distillation of pertinent scientific findings that gives the public a sense of how regulatory agencies ignored earlier science and why agencies need to take protective action now.” In the report, Lear and Rees discuss how the U.S. Naval Medical Research Institute in 1971 issued a report that reviewed 2,311 scientific studies on the biological and health effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR). Most of the studies examined by the Navy involved low-intensity EMR signals in the 1 to 4 gigahertz (GHz) range, said Lear and Rees. “These types of wireless exposures are virtually identical with those from modern devices and wireless sources such as cell phones, WiFi, Bluetooth, smart meters , GPS, wearables, and wireless infrastructure.” The Navy’s review found 132 different biological effects, symptoms and diseases linked to wireless exposures . According to Lear and Rees, 23 of those are among the fastest-growing chronic diseases and conditions in the U.S. today, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or ADHD, anxiety, asthma, autism, chronic fatigue, diabetes, leukemia, autoimmune disease and celiac disease. In 2016, Lear examined the growth of chronic disease from 1990 to 2015 and the related economic costs of those diseases. His research found that 36 chronic diseases and conditions doubled from 1990 to 2015. “Of the 36 chronic diseases and conditions that more than doubled (1990-2015), the U.S. Navy study warned us of the connection between wireless radiation and twenty-three of those chronic diseases, predicting what has indeed happened to the health of Americans,” the authors of the report wrote. They added: “By ignoring the earlier science, U.S. regulators failed to protect the American people from the dangers of wireless technologies. In doing so, they imposed millions of unnecessary chronic exposure conditions on the American public.” Rees told The Defender she hopes U.S. regulators finally take action. “Pressure is needed from all directions to encourage federal regulatory agencies to do their jobs, and to hold these agencies accountable.” The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has not updated its exposure limits for wireless radiation since 1996. In 2021, CHD and other groups won a lawsuit challenging the FCC ’s exposure limits. The groups filed 11,000 pages of evidence of harm from 5G and wireless technology, which they alleged the FCC ignored when it decided to keep its 1996 guidelines. The pages included evidence of widespread sickness due to wireless radiation exposure. The FCC has yet to comply with a court-ordered mandate to explain how the agency determined that its current guidelines adequately protect humans and the environment against the harmful effects of exposure to wireless radiation. Lear and Rees plan to send hard copies of their report to all U.S. Congress members and at least 1,000 U.S. business leaders. “We want this information to get to people who are courageous enough to make a difference, including government leaders, business leaders, religious leaders and media,” Rees said. Business leaders need to understand the connection between wireless exposures and their employees’ mood, health and therefore productivity, she said. Rees is a senior policy adviser for the National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy and founder of Manhattan Neighbors for Safer Telecommunications . According to the report: “By 2015, the 23 diseases the U.S. Navy predicted may have added more than $2 trillion in annual health care costs to the U.S. economy due to their negligence.” The authors acknowledged that other factors have likely contributed to the current U.S. chronic disease crisis, such as sugar consumption, glyphosate and other pesticide exposures. ‘We’ve been misled about the benefits of wireless’ In the report, Lear and Rees also cite other scientific reports that have shown a link between wireless radiation and negative health impacts , including the BioInitiative 2012 Report . The BioInitiative Report, updated in 2017, cites more than 2,200 scientific studies that link low-level EMR exposure to dozens of diseases and biological effects, including neurological effects, brain cancer, fetal effects, blood-brain barrier damage, DNA damage, breast cancer, biochemical imbalances, leukemia, decreased fertility and oxidative stress. The report also discusses studies that suggested a possible biological mechanism for explaining how wireless radiation is linked to chronic disease. Rees said, “We have been misled about the relative benefits of wireless.” Wired connections are far superior to wireless for numerous reasons, including connection speed, according to a 2018 National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy report . “It is faster, far more energy efficient, higher audio quality, more reliable, more resilient in weather events, more secure, and more enduring, meaning that it is not subject to the costs of planned obsolescence like wireless technologies,” Rees said. She added: “We need to start taking responsibility ourselves, and minimize our personal wireless exposure while supporting efforts, such as CHD’s new ‘ 704 No More ’ initiative, to restore local control over cell towers and antennas.” The 704 No More initiative is raising money to legally challenge Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which prohibits local authorities from denying cell tower applications based on health and environmental effects. Related articles in The Defender New Report Contradicts Telecom Industry Claim That Wireless Radiation Is Safe Wireless Radiation Sickness Gets a New Name: ‘EMR Syndrome’ FCC Limits for Wireless Radiation Exposure Decades Out of Date, Experts Say

TRUMP: “We're not going to have to buy, we're going to have Gaza. We don't have to buy — there's nothing to buy — we will have Gaza.” What does that even mean? How can one just say “your country is mine now and you have no say?”

https://www.theinteldrop.org/2025/02/18/how-trump-wants-to-colonize-ukraine/ The rape and pillage of what's left of a country's resources and assets. The Trump administration wants Ukraine to give it access to half of all its natural resources without giving anything in return. This is only intended to guarantee the repayment of previous US aid. Kiev is resisting, but has no chance. It is nothing new that the USA does not help anyone out of pure charity or even because of any kind of “values”. The USA always makes a clear cost-benefit analysis and only takes action when it believes it will be profitable. This also applies to Ukraine, because the Biden administration would also have presented Ukraine with the bill for US aid at some point. It would not have done it with a sledgehammer like Trump, but as I showed in my book ” The Ukraine Cartel ,” the Biden clan and its entourage had massive financial interests in Ukraine and they would of course have kept themselves safe, but would have concealed it better. Trump chose the sledgehammer method and sent his finance minister to Kyiv last Wednesday, where he presented Zelensky with a document that Zelensky was supposed to sign. In it, Ukraine was supposed to transfer half of all its natural resources to the USA. But not only that, the USA also wants half of all revenues from infrastructure such as ports, airports and other things for itself. Continue reading HERE

...and it's coming to a place near you soon!