Search Results

https://expose-news.com/2025/03/25/trumps-banning-of-cbdcs-is-a-moot-point-americans-already-live-under-a-cbdc-system/ President Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14178 ostensibly “bans” CBDCs.  However, his administration is quietly advancing stablecoin legislation that would hand digital currency control to the same banking cartel that owns the Federal Reserve. Aaron Day says that the STABLE Act and GENIUS Act don’t protect financial privacy – they enshrine financial surveillance into law, requiring strict Know Your Customer tracking on every transaction.  “This isn’t defeating digital tyranny – it’s rebranding it,” he said. Last week, Brownstone Institute published an article written by American entrepreneur Aaron Day about stablecoins being the backdoor to total financial control.  The following is an overview of Day’s article.  “This article cuts through the distractions to expose a sobering truth: the battle isn’t about stopping a future CBDC – it’s about recognising the financial surveillance system that already exists. Your financial sovereignty is already under attack, and the last off-ramps are disappearing,” he wrote. Adding, “The greatest sleight of hand in modern finance isn’t cryptocurrency or complex derivatives – it’s convincing Americans they don’t already live under a central bank digital currency system. Let’s dismantle this illusion by examining how our current dollar already functions as a fully operational CBDC.” Central Bank Digital Currencies A central bank digital currency (“CBDC”) is issued and controlled by a nation’s monetary authority.   As Day argues in his book ‘ Fifty Shades of Central Bank Tyranny ’, the US financial system already functions as a digital control grid, with 92% of all US dollars existing only as digital entries in databases allowing for monitoring and restriction of transactions. “The Fed’s digital infrastructure processes over $4 trillion in transactions daily, all without a single physical dollar changing hands. This isn’t some small experimental system – it’s the backbone of our entire economy,” Day wrote. “The Federal Reserve, our central bank, doesn’t create most new money by printing bills [physical bank notes]; it generates it by adding numbers to an Oracle database.” “Commercial banks extend this digital system,” Day explained. “When you deposit money, the bank records it in their Microsoft or Oracle database …  The key point remains: the dollar predominantly exists as entries in a network of databases controlled by the Fed and commercial banks … Our current digital dollars already have [programmable and trackable] capabilities built in.” In other words, the US government’s financial surveillance system is already in place.  Day explained that, facilitated by laws such as the Bank Secrecy Act and Patriot Act, the existing financial surveillance system enables government agencies like the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and National Security Agency (“NSA”) to collect and analyse financial data without meaningful oversight, effectively creating a system of digital control. This surveillance enables active censorship, for example, as demonstrated during Canada’s trucker protests in 2022 and targeting people in the USA, such as Kanye West and Dr. Joseph Mercola. The government’s true intention is not to stop financial crime but to control people, as evidenced by the accumulation of trillions of financial records on ordinary Americans and the failure to curb financial crime.   And the ultimate goal, rooted in the technocracy movement since the 1930s, is to digitise all assets, including money, stocks and real estate, under a global ledger, enabling central banks and governments to monitor and program every asset and tying wealth to resource consumption and a social credit system. Multiple countries, including the Bahamas, Jamaica and Nigeria, have launched retail CBDCs, with 44 pilots ongoing worldwide, driven by goals of modernising payments and enhancing financial inclusion. The US is taking a different approach, with legislation like the STABLE Act and GENIUS Act aiming to create a framework for privately issued digital dollars, effectively achieving the same surveillance and control objectives as CBDCs through stablecoins. These legislative efforts, supported by figures like President Trump and Mark Carney, the new Prime Minister of Canada, are designed to implement a system of financial control where every transaction is monitored and assets are tokenised* and regulated, ultimately leading to a loss of financial autonomy and privacy. *Note: Tokenisation is the process of converting rights to an asset into a digital token on a blockchain or database. This applies to both currencies and other assets like real estate, stocks, or commodities. Tokenisation enables:Digital representation of ownership.Programmability (restrictions on how/when/where assets can be used).Traceability of all transactions. “When politicians and central bankers claim we don’t have a CBDC, they’re playing a game of definitions. The substantive elements that define a CBDC – digital creation, central bank issuance, programmability, surveillance and censorship capability – are all present in our current system,” Day said. Stablecoins Stablecoin is a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a stable value by pegging to an external asset, typically the US dollar.  Examples of stablecoin include Tether (“USDT”), USD Coin (“USDC,” issued by Circle Internet Financial with backing from Goldman Sachs and BlackRock) and JPM Coin (issued by JPMorgan Chase). Stablecoins, such as USDC and USDT, are being used as tools for financial censorship, which demonstrates that they are not censorship-resistant and can be frozen by issuers or regulators. The US government, including the Trump Administration, is supporting the use of stablecoins but with strict regulations such as Know Your Customer (“KYC”) and Anti-Money Laundering (“AML”) requirements, which will lead to pervasive tracking and control. The use of stablecoins poses significant risks to privacy and autonomy and could lead to corporate control over digital assets, with companies like Circle and Tether having significant influence over the market and ties to the Trump Administration through figures like David Sacks and Steven Mnuchin. The STABLE Act and GENIUS Act restrict stablecoin issuance to banks and Fed-aligned entities, further consolidating power and benefiting investors like Goldman Sachs and BlackRock. Related: Peter Thiel and other technocrats surrounding Donald Trump Resistance to Centralised Control Privacy coins are cryptocurrencies specifically designed to preserve transaction privacy and resist surveillance, Day said.  Adding that privacy coins like Monero, Zano and Kaurma offer a way to maintain financial privacy and autonomy and resist the growing surveillance state but are under pressure from regulators. “’Privacy isn’t a luxury – it’s a tool for self-reliance’. Using these [privacy] coins means choosing economic freedom in a world leaning toward centralised control,” he concluded. You can read Day’s full article HERE . Day doesn’t believe fiat money is the answer.  He explained that fiat currencies are inherently unstable, created from debt and backed by trust rather than tangible assets. Governments exploit them to extend their power, printing endless money for wars and bailouts, which ultimately devalue citizens’ savings, he said. We don’t agree with Day’s trust in specified cryptocurrencies over physical forms of currency. We believe that the greatest protection of privacy and resistance of them all is cash, i.e., physical bank notes and coins, or some other physical form of currency such as gold, silver or Bradbury Treasury notes, also known as the Bradbury Pound.  Because all digital “money” will be as detrimental to privacy and autonomy as CBDCs or stablecoins, even if they did not start that way.  Bitcoin is an example of digital “money” that was reportedly started by a group of libertarians and anarchists as an act of resistance to centralised control.  However, the same group that came up with Bitcoin were also transhumanists and were pushing the ideas of artificial intelligence, intelligence augmentation of humans, space colonisation, digital currencies, nanotechnologies and genetic engineering.  Transhumanism is also tied up with depopulation; it is the eugenics movement rebranded. All forms of cryptocurrency, more accurately digital data posing as currency, are setting the stage for technocracy and transhumanism.  Further reading: The founders of Bitcoin were transhumanists , The Exposé, 5 March 2025 Roger Ver faces prison for exposing how US government hijacked Bitcoin , The Exposé, 21 December 2024 The next bankers’ heist: Swap US government-owned land and minerals for Bitcoin , The Exposé, 29 November 2024 Jeffrey Epstein’s links to the development of Bitcoin and CBDCs , The Exposé, 23 January 2024 Eugenics, Transhumanism and Jeffrey Epstein’s Network , The Exposé, 17 February 2023 An open letter to the UK Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer , The Exposé, 5 November 2022 The 1914 Bank Run That Nearly Sparked a Revolution , LinkedIn post by Graham Rowan, 17 September 2024 (archived HERE )

https://www.newstarget.com/2025-03-24-scam-income-tax-purchase-tax-property-tax.html The income tax system in the U.S. is the biggest scam in history and should be abolished, most especially when citizens are taxed on income while the federal government prints and wastes trillions of dollars. Citizens are subjected to multiple layers of taxation on their income, spending, possessions, and estate – including income tax, sales tax, property tax and estate tax –which is unjust and exploitative. Despite paying taxes for infrastructure, citizens are still charged tolls for roads, bridges, and tunnels, suggesting that tax funds are not being used effectively for their intended purposes. The taxation of essential items like food and the continuous taxation on vehicles and homes are unjustifiable and only serve to burden citizens financially. The government misuses tax funds for luxury and foreign wars. Worse, it has hired 87,000 new IRS agents as a tool to enforce tyranny and target conservatives. Ultimately, the abolition of the IRS is the only viable solution. Yes, it’s time to abolish the biggest scam in U.S. history – income tax. Ask yourself, why are you taxed on income by the federal government to pay for schools, roads, bridges and the military, but the feds print money by the trillions and waste it, embezzle it, and spend it on their own luxury vacations? Ask yourself, why do you get taxed on the money you earn, then on the money you have left from that when you spend it, then again on the things you own that you bought with that double-taxed money, and then again when you die and your loved ones inherit that triple-taxed money that’s left? It's called estate tax and inheritance tax, and the government has its hands in your already taxed money again. What a huge scam it all is. Are you mad yet? Why are we taxed on our income, spending, possessions, and estate after death? So you buy a vehicle, pay the taxes on it when you buy it, then pay personal property tax on it every year. How is that justified? So you buy a home, pay taxes on it every year with the net income that you have left after paying 20 percent tax to the feds, tax to your state, tax to your local area, tax on products, tax on services, processing fees, interest on money you have to borrow because you’re broke, and then what? Bankruptcy? That has fees also. So you supposedly pay taxes so the government has money to fix the roads, bridges and tunnels, and build new ones when needed, but guess what? It’s time to pay the tolls at those roads, bridges and tunnels. Why are their toll fees? What happened to the taxes paying for all that? Every metropolitan city has “EZ pass” for all the HOV, bridges, tunnels, new “expressways,” and so forth. Why? You think you’re saving money? You just got quadruple-taxed, my friends. That’s why they call it “rush hour” because you’re rushing to spend more of your net money getting billed for everything you already paid taxes on. Why is food taxed? Aren’t the farmers paying taxes on their land, seeds and farm equipment? Didn’t the delivery drivers and their companies pay taxes on the trucks they use to carry the goods? Why are food taxes and service taxes higher than other taxes? What’s the difference if it’s all fraud? Is that so the populace will be so busy negotiating the differences that they all fail to see they’re getting ripped off across the board? Why do we pay taxes for the military when we’re fighting in wars we never voted for? Why do we give all our weapons to other countries that are losing wars they should have never engaged, like Ukraine and Israel? We are quadruple force-taxed or we face prison time for “tax evasion,” yet the taxes never pay for anything that benefits us. That’s why Biden hired 87,000 new IRS agents to enforce the tyranny on all Conservatives and to wipe out the middle class. Can you see it now? Hope and pray that Trump abolishes the IRS, because it’s the biggest Ponzi scheme ever invented. It’s not even constitutional. Look it up. Tune your apocalypse dial to Preparedness.news for updates on real news about surviving the financial tsunami the Democrats created for us all.

https://www.newstarget.com/2025-03-18-aspartame-contains-nerve-damaging-venom-peptides-from-wasps.html Sure, you may have heard about the dangers of consuming the most popular artificial sweetener on the planet called aspartame, but you probably do not know how it is manufactured. If you did, you would understand why most people who consume it suffer from anxiety and are a nervous wreck most of the time. Many people who drink diet sodas and chew sugar-free gum that contains aspartame also take prescription drugs for anxiety and depression. Wonder why? Aspartame is made from the waste products of genetically modified E. coli bacteria and contains venom peptides from wasps . Aspartame disrupts the nervous system and can cause anxiety and an extremely agitated state of mind. This information was patented in 1999 by its manufacturer Monsanto, that also makes pesticides. Aspartame makes consumers extremely nervous and anxious because it contains GMO E. coli bacteria and venom peptides from wasps to attack the nervous system The European patent for aspartame is available online and confirms the toxic artificial sweetener and sugar substitute is made from the waste products (excrement) of genetically modified E. coli bacteria. Upon further research conducted into the ingredients and “cloned microorganisms” used to create this lab-made nightmare, it is found that the bacteria waste is treated with a large peptide (dipeptide with the formula Asp-Phe-me) that traces back to the sequence, structure, and expression of a wasp venom protein (peptide) that attacks the nervous system of its prey. That’s right, for the past 25 years, scientists in laboratories have been creating aspartame using cloned microorganisms containing DNA codes harvested from the poisonous wasp family. This “dipeptide” is inserted into a cloning vehicle, which in turn is introduced into a suitable host microorganism, then methylated and then debenzylated to form aspartame. Aspartame hit the markets at the same time that psychotropic prescription medications (SSRIs) swept the nation. Coincidence? Nope. Aspartame drives anxiety (and eventually chronic depression) through the roof, and then all of its victims rush to the medical doctors, pediatricians, and psychiatrists and get prescribed psycho medications that have side effects of suicidal thoughts. Maybe that’s because these patients have been drinking diet sodas and chewing sugar-free gum that contains wasp venom that attacks their central nervous system all day long. Got anxiety. Feeling nervous all day long? That’s why. If you’re eating aspartame, you’re essentially consuming some wasp venom and genetically modified E. coli excrement with every chew or swallow. Watch out for the most popular products that contain aspartame, including diet sodas, gum, ice cream, gelatin, cereals, juices, and almost every product that’s labeled “Zero-” something. If you want products that taste sweet, without the calories, try products that contain natural Stevia, which comes from a leaf that grows in Brazil. Other consumers buy products with monk fruit or xylitol as a sugar substitute. Better yet just cut back on all products that have “added sugars” listed in the ingredients. Natural whole organic fruit has no added sugars, and the natural sugar is attached to the fiber in the fruit, which is healthy. Tune your food news frequency to  FoodSupply.news  and get updates on more toxic foods and artificial sweeteners that drive anxiety, fueling the SSRI epidemic.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2025/03/18/the-truth-about-bread.aspx A simple dietary staple has become a digestive nightmare. What happened over the past century that made it harder for modern bodies to handle? The Truth About Bread — Why Your Ancestors Could Digest It (And Why You Might Not) Story at-a-glance Our ancestors consumed large quantities of bread (up to 16 pounds weekly for men and 8 pounds for women in the 1880s) without widespread digestive issues seen today. Pre-harvest desiccation with glyphosate (increased 400% in two decades) leaves residues in wheat products that may disrupt gut microbiome and contribute to digestive disorders Modern wheat varieties have been selectively bred for higher yields and industrial processing compatibility rather than nutritional value or digestibility. The shift from slow fermentation methods to quick-rise commercial yeast has also eliminated the microbial diversity and protein breakdown that made traditional bread nutritious and easier to digest "Enriched flour" contains synthetic nutrients and iron shards (ferrous sulfate) that can contribute to oxidative stress and may not provide the intended health benefits Traditional sourdough fermentation breaks down gluten proteins (particularly gliadin) by more than 50% over 24 hours, making bread more digestible for many people with sensitivities Most commercial bread contains hidden additives like inflammatory seed oils and harmful chemicals like potassium bromate (banned in many countries but not the U.S.) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ For thousands of years, bread has been essential to human nutrition — a dietary staple enjoyed daily across countless cultures, likely because flour could be stored year-round, ensuring a reliable food source during times of scarcity. In fact, our ancestors ate bread in quantities that would surprise many modern eaters. According to household guides from the 1880s, the average adult man was expected to consume a remarkable 16 pounds of bread per week, while women consumed about 8 pounds weekly. That's over a pound of bread a day! Grocery list from 'Warne's Model housekeeper,' 1882, where the author mentions this list in addition to produce available at the market. Today, bread has a very different reputation. Once considered a fundamental food, it's now often avoided and can cause various health problems — from bloating and brain fog to more serious conditions like celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. But what changed? Is bread itself the problem, or is there more to this story? As a Note: I am not writing this article to convince you to eat bread. Instead, I write this in hopes to reduce food fear in this (sometimes toxic) modern health space. It is a lot more empowering to better understand the WHY behind certain things, instead of arbitrarily labeling food as BAD or GOOD. The Ancient Relationship Between Humans and Bread Our love affair with bread is ancient — dating back thousands of years when early civilizations first ground wild grains and mixed them with water to create rudimentary flatbreads. Bread is deeply embedded in sacred texts, rituals, and traditions, symbolizing sustenance, community, and faith across cultures. The Egyptians, for example, played a pivotal role in the evolution of bread-making around 5,000 years ago, likely discovering leavened bread through wild yeasts fermenting dough left exposed to the elements. This discovery revolutionized human nutrition and led to sourdough fermentation becoming the dominant bread-making method across cultures. Unlike modern methods, traditional bread-making wasn't focused on speed or shelf-life — it prioritized nutrition, digestibility, and flavor through time-tested techniques. Your Grandparents Didn't Have Gluten Issues Today, celiac disease affects approximately 1 in 100 people, with even higher rates of general gluten sensitivity. Yet just a century ago, these conditions were exceedingly rare. Why could your grandparents digest bread with ease while modern populations struggle? The answer lies not in bread itself, but in what we've done to it. Modern Wheat — Not Your Ancestor's Grain The wheat of today bears little resemblance to the heritage varieties our ancestors consumed. Over the last century, wheat has been systematically bred for higher yields, disease resistance, and industrial processing compatibility — not nutritional value or digestibility. While modern wheat is not yet genetically modified in the traditional sense (the first GMO wheat variety for drought resistance was only approved in the U.S. in August 2024 1 ), it has been dramatically altered through selective breeding programs that prioritize commercial interests over human health. These breeding programs have created varieties that produce more grain per acre but contain altered protein structures that may be harder for humans to digest. The result? Higher profits for industrial agriculture but more digestive distress for consumers. The Glyphosate Factor — Pre-Harvest Desiccation Perhaps one of the most concerning modern agricultural practices affecting the digestibility of wheat is pre-harvest desiccation — a process largely unknown to consumers but increasingly linked to digestive health problems. Even though wheat is not typically a GMO crop, glyphosate use on wheat has skyrocketed by 400% in the past two decades. 2 Why? Because farmers discovered they could use this herbicide as a drying agent, particularly in regions with short growing seasons or wet harvests. "The herbicide, glyphosate, is applied to wheat crops before harvest to encourage ripening resulting in higher glyphosate residues in commercial wheat products within North America." 3 This 'pre-harvest desiccation' practice involves spraying crops with glyphosate shortly before harvest to force uniform drying and enable earlier harvesting. Originally developed in 1980s Scotland to address unreliable grain drying conditions, the technique has spread globally. 4   The result? Non-GMO wheat commonly receives a "glyphosate bath" before harvest, meaning residues end up in your daily bread (and other baked goods made with wheat). Research has begun linking glyphosate exposure to the rise in celiac disease and other digestive disorders. 5 The mechanism makes logical sense: glyphosate is designed to kill weeds and microorganisms in soil, but our digestive systems contain trillions of beneficial microorganisms essential for health. "Glyphosate residues on food could cause dysbiosis, given that opportunistic pathogens are more resistant to glyphosate compared to commensal bacteria." 6 In other words, glyphosate exposure through food may preferentially kill beneficial gut bacteria while allowing harmful bacteria to flourish — a recipe for digestive distress and chronic inflammation. The Problem with 'Enriched Flour' — Iron Shards and Synthetic Vitamins Walk down any bread aisle in America and you'll see the word "enriched flour" prominently displayed in the ingredient lists on nearly every package. This seemingly positive term masks a concerning reality: most modern flour has been stripped of its natural nutrients during processing, then artificially "enriched" with synthetic versions. This enrichment process typically includes adding iron shards (yes, actual metal particles) that can contribute to iron overload and increase oxidative stress in susceptible individuals. As Dr. Ray Peat explains: "Industrially processed grains have most of the nutrients, such as vitamin E, the B vitamins, manganese, magnesium, etc., removed to improve the products' shelf life and efficiency of processing, and the government required that certain nutrients be added to them as a measure to protect the public's health, but the supplementation did not reflect the best science even when it was first made law, since food industry lobbyists managed to impose compromises that led to the use of the cheapest chemicals, rather than those that offered the greatest health benefits. For example, studies of processed animal food had demonstrated that the addition of iron (as the highly reactive form, ferrous sulfate, which happens to be cheap and easy to handle) created disease in animals, by destroying vitamins in the food." Since 1941, federal law has required that iron shavings, in the form of ferrous sulfate, be added to bread, flour, pasta, cereals, and most packaged foods. As a result, Western society has seen an overwhelming increase in iron shaving consumption, largely due to the mandatory fortification of grain products. However, the amount of added iron reported on food labels is often significantly underreported. Many labels list "reduced iron," a misleading term — it actually refers to iron added in its ferrous form, which is highly reactive and easily absorbed by the body. Bread, flour, pasta, cereals, and most packaged foods now contain iron shavings that has been artificially added as ferrous sulfate due to federal law since 1941. Since, we have been bombarded with iron in Western society more than ever before, largely due to the mandatory fortification of grain products. Plus, the amount of added iron reported on food labels is often grossly underreported. 7 Many labels list "reduced iron," which is misleading terminology — it actually means iron is added in the ferrous form, which is very reactive and easily absorbed by the body. What's particularly concerning is that food fortified with iron does very little to prevent anemia, the condition it was intended to address. Sweden and Finland implemented iron fortification in their food until 1995, and Denmark until 1987, before banning it due to health concerns and low bioavailability. After stopping iron fortification, iron deficiency anemia remained virtually unchanged in those countries, 8 suggesting the practice may offer more risks than benefits. The flour enrichment process also adds synthetic B vitamins that may not be properly utilized by the body. Consider folic acid — the synthetic form of vitamin B9 added to enriched flour. Unlike folate (the natural form found in foods like leafy greens and liver), synthetic folic acid requires conversion to tetrahydrofolate in the body. If there are issues with this conversion process, folic acid can accumulate in the bloodstream, interfering with the body's natural folate balance and contributing to B vitamin dysregulation. Hidden Seed Oils and Harmful Additives Open the ingredients list on a standard loaf of bread, and you'll likely find unexpected additions like soybean oil or vegetable oil. These industrial seed oils, high in inflammatory omega-6 fatty acids, have infiltrated modern bread recipes for reasons that have nothing to do with nutrition or tradition. Remember, seed oils are cheap and abundant due to government subsidies! Even more concerning, many conventional flours and baked goods in the U.S. contain potassium bromate — a possible human carcinogen that's banned in numerous other countries. 9 This additive strengthens dough and allows it to rise higher, but at what cost to human health? The Lost Art of Fermentation Perhaps the most significant change in bread production has been the abandonment of traditional fermentation methods in favor of speed and efficiency. For thousands of years, people relied on sourdough fermentation to make bread digestible. This natural process used wild yeast and lactic acid bacteria to leaven dough slowly, breaking down gluten and phytic acid while infusing the bread with beneficial bacteria like Lactobacillus reuteri (the same bacteria passed from mothers to babies during breastfeeding). The fermentation timeline tells the story: • Ancient times through 1800s — Most bread was made using wild fermentation methods like sourdough or with yeast sourced from breweries. The slow fermentation process developed complex flavors and made bread easier to digest by breaking down difficult proteins. • Mid-1800s — As brewing became more industrialized, bakers began using yeast from breweries (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), which produced a faster rise than sourdough but slightly reduced the natural fermentation time. • Early 1900s — The demand for faster, more reliable baking led to commercial yeast cultivation, allowing bakers to produce loaves in hours rather than days. • Mid-1900s to present — Modern instant yeast and active dry yeast dominate commercial baking, offering quick results but eliminating the microbial diversity and slow fermentation that made traditional bread nutritious and digestible. With commercial yeast, the process is streamlined and highly controlled for mass production, ensuring quick and consistent results. However, this method may lack the depth of flavor and potential health benefits that many believe come from the slower, more natural fermentation of sourdough. The Gluten Connection Gluten is a complex mixture of proteins found in wheat and other grains. It consists of two main proteins: glutenin and gliadin. Together, these proteins form the structure and texture of dough. Glutenin contributes to the elasticity and chewiness of the dough, while gliadin is responsible for the dough's ability to rise and hold air. While glutenin and gliadin work in tandem to create the unique texture of bread, it's gliadin that is often the main culprit in digestive discomfort for sensitive individuals. In those with non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), gliadin can be particularly problematic, as it is harder to break down in the digestive system. Normally, proteins like gliadin are broken down by enzymes in the digestive system into smaller pieces called peptides, and then further into amino acids, which are small enough to be absorbed by the body. However, in people with gluten sensitivity or digestive issues, gliadin is only partially broken down into oligopeptides, which are short chains of amino acids. These oligopeptides are problematic because they are still relatively large, and because of their specific amino acid sequences and low surface area, they aren't easily broken down any further by digestive enzymes. 10 This incomplete digestion leaves larger gliadin peptides in the digestive system, where they can trigger immune responses or damage the gut. Specifically, they can interfere with the intestinal lining, blunting the villi and increasing intestinal permeability. 11 , 12 When the gut lining is compromised, it can lead to inflammation and digestive discomfort, contributing to conditions like NCGS. In other words, in sensitive individuals, the gluten (gliadin) isn't broken down into small enough components, leaving larger, harmful peptides that the body can't process or handle properly. This is where sourdough fermentation can come into play! In traditional sourdough fermentation, the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) present in the dough play a crucial role in breaking down these gluten proteins. The LAB convert sugars in the wheat flour to lactic acid, which increases the dough's acidity. This higher acidity helps facilitate the pre-breakdown of gluten, particularly the gliadin protein, improving digestion. This is why sourdough can be easier to digest, as the fermentation breaks down gliadin. 13 Notably, specific strains of LAB can hydrolyze wheat proteins, including gliadin, by more than 50% over a 24-hour fermentation period. 14 This reduction in gliadin content makes sourdough bread easier to digest, especially for individuals with sensitivities or compromised gut integrity. "The consumption of low-gliadin bread E82 by NCGS subjects induced positive changes in the gut microbiota composition, increasing the butyrate-producing bacteria and favoring a microbial profile that is suggested to have a key role in the maintenance or improvement of gut permeability." 15 While sourdough isn't gluten-free, it significantly reduces the amount of gliadin present, making it easier to digest for many people, especially those with gut issues. A study found that sourdough-fermented wheat flour contained less gliadin (0.81% to 1.26%) compared to control flour (3.52% to 3.97%). 16 This could explain why sourdough is often better tolerated than modern bread, which skips the crucial fermentation step that would otherwise help break down gluten proteins. Without this step, quick-rise breads retain their full gluten content, which may be harder to digest and exacerbate symptoms in sensitive individuals. So, the problem may not be gluten itself but rather how it's processed (or not processed) in modern bread production. Important Note: While some people with gluten sensitivities may find sourdough bread more tolerable, it's important to note that sourdough bread still contains gluten and is not safe for those with celiac disease. Why Traditional Methods Matter Traditional sourdough fermentation creates several advantages for digestibility: • It breaks down gluten proteins, particularly gliadin, making them easier to digest • It reduces phytic acid (an antinutrient that binds minerals), improving mineral absorption • It creates prebiotic compounds that support gut health • It introduces beneficial bacteria that may improve gut microbiome diversity And research confirms these improvements! Fermentation breaks down both gluten and FODMAPs (fermentable carbohydrates that can cause digestive distress), making traditionally prepared bread more tolerable for many people. 17 , 18 So, Is Bread Bad for You? Bread itself isn't inherently "bad" — it's what we've done to it through modern agricultural practices, processing methods, and baking techniques that has transformed this ancient staple from nourishment into a potential health concern for many. The solution isn't necessarily abandoning bread but rather returning to traditional methods and quality ingredients: Choose real sourdough made with long fermentation (not the store-bought "sourdough" with artificial sourdough flavoring. If the ingredient list includes 'yeast,' that is not true sourdough!) Seek out heritage wheat varieties when possible Choose organic flour, or know where your flour comes from to avoid pre-harvest desiccation (a glyphosate bath!) Avoid enriched flour with synthetic additives Read ingredient lists carefully to avoid hidden seed oils and preservatives Support small-scale bakers using traditional techniques and high-quality flour For those who truly cannot tolerate wheat, carefully selected gluten-free options may be appropriate — but even then, ingredient quality matters tremendously. Always make sure to read ingredient lists to avoid hidden gums, preservatives, and seed oils! Conclusion Our ancestors thrived on bread for millennia without the epidemic of digestive issues we see today. The difference wasn't that they were somehow more resilient — it's that their bread was fundamentally different from what fills most modern store shelves. The problem isn't bread itself ... it's what we've done to it. One reason why traditional bread-making has been abandoned by large food manufacturers is simple: time. Real sourdough takes patience — a commodity in short supply in our industrial food system. Authentic sourdough costs more than standard processed bread because it requires this extra time, skill, and quality ingredients. The fermentation process can't be rushed without sacrificing the very benefits that make it special. By understanding the history of bread-making and the significant changes that have occurred over the past century, we can make more informed choices about this dietary staple. Whether you choose traditionally fermented sourdough, carefully selected commercial options, or gluten-free alternatives, knowledge is the key ingredient to making bread work for your body rather than against it. In the end, the best bread may be the one that most closely resembles what your ancestors would recognize — simple, fermented, and made with integrity. About the Author Ashley Armstrong is dedicated to building an alternative food system grounded in regenerative farming and traditional food preparation methods, all aimed at promoting both human and environmental health. Her mission is to provide access to food that is not only nutritious but also easily digested and well-tolerated. Armstrong is the co-founder of Angel Acres Egg Club , which specializes in low-PUFA (polyunsaturated fat) eggs that are shipped to all 50 states. Armstrong also co-founded Nourish Food Club , which ships long fermented traditional sourdough, low-PUFA chicken, low-PUFA pork, beef, cheese, and A2 to all 50 states. While the egg club has memberships open, Nourish Food Club has a temporary waiting list which you can join to be notified when new spots open up!

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-03-15-fda-admits-covid-mrna-vaccines-cause-cancer.html The natural health advocacy world and truth media followers around the globe cannot believe their eyes, as the FDA has just made the explosive admission that the mRNA clot shots are indeed spiked with contaminants that have triggered the global surge in cancers. One hard look (clinical study) at Pfizer’s Covid stabs and the FDA had to admit to the world that they contain dangerous levels of excess DNA contamination , and that these fragments are driving cancer cases through the roof. It’s called Turbo Cancer and people are experiencing stage 4 and stage 5 cancer out of the blue, shortly after they receive the deadly mRNA Pfizer China Flu jab. Inside the FDA laboratory where leading scientists have discovered that billions of humans who have been mRNA injected could get cancer from the clot shots How many mass media outlets will publish this medical shocker? Natural health advocates warned about this long before the clot shots were even released under the Emergency Use Authorization act. They are experiments carried out on humans without any proof of safety or efficacy , not to mention long-term safety trials, as they were rushed through the process. From lab to turbo cancer. Tests conducted at the FDA’s own White Oak Campus in Maryland found SHOCKING LEVELS of DNA contamination in the Covid clot shots. Surprise, surprise! The residual DNA levels greatly exceeded regulatory safety limits by up to 470 times. Let’s hear that again. The contamination of residual DNA fragments greatly exceeded regulatory safety limits by up to 470 times. Let that sink in for a minute. Did Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci know this long ago? Of course they did. The Turbo Cancer jabs were always the main part of the PLANDEMIC experiment to rid the earth of a few billion people, just like Gates said at his TED talk years ago. It was never about preventing the contraction or spread of Covid, because Covid was no more deadly than the seasonal flu. They used propaganda that it was much worse to sell everyone on getting the Turbo Cancer injections. Get it? Now the FDA is no longer run by psychopaths, like it was under the O’Biden Regime. The findings of this PEER-REVIEWED study were published in the Journal of High School Science , for any naysayers out there. Sure, this isn’t NIH or BMJ, but the mass media surely does NOT want the masses knowing about this, or they’ll all freak out and burn Fauci at the stake like a scarecrow. The FDA researchers employed two primary analytical methods, both of which confirmed the presence of DNA contamination up to 470 times higher than permissible thresholds. NanoDrop Analysis  – This technique uses UV spectrometry to measure the combined levels of DNA and RNA in the vaccine. While it provides an initial assessment, it tends to overestimate DNA concentrations due to interference from RNA, even when RNA-removal kits are utilized. Qubit Analysis  – For more precise measurements, the researchers relied on the Qubit system, which quantifies double-stranded DNA using fluorometric dye. In case you want more proof, these findings align with earlier reports from independent laboratories in the  United States ,  Canada ,  Australia ,  Germany , and  France . Bookmark plague.info  to your favorite independent websites for updates on new gain-of-function viruses the CDC and WHO release into the “wild.”

The news hit like a gut punch this week: Gene Hackman—the old-school Hollywood legend of The French Connection, Unforgiven, and Superman—gone. Found dead in his Santa Fe home alongside his wife and one of their three dogs. A tragedy, sure, but the details? They’re so twisted even the mainstream media can’t whitewash it. Something’s off—way off—and the media are barely scratching the surface. Here’s what they won’t tell you: Gene wasn’t just some retired millionaire kicking back in New Mexico. He was neighbors with Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah, that Epstein. And—get this—he owned an island right next door to Oprah Winfrey’s private island in British Columbia. Cozy, right? But Gene wasn’t playing nice with the elite anymore. Word is, he was sick to death of the Epstein client list cover-up. He told friends he was done watching the Deep State and rogue FBI agents shred the truth. He was ready to talk—ready to burn it all down. Then—out of nowhere—he’s gone. Suspicious doesn’t even cover it; it’s a neon sign screaming foul play. And we’ve got the unfiltered truth—details so chilling they’ll haunt you. What went down in that house? And why did Gene Hackman’s last stand threaten to unravel everything for the untouchable elite?

https://expose-news.com/2025/03/04/solar-power-is-at-least-10-times-more-expensive/ A peer-reviewed study published in 2022 found that wind and solar power are more expensive than coal, natural gas and nuclear power. The study shows that even in favourable locations like Texas, solar power is 10 times and wind power 7 times more expensive than natural gas.  The differential is even greater in regions of the world that do not enjoy Texas’ favourable climate. The next time some climate activist or wind and solar shill claims wind and solar are less expensive than conventional energy sources, point them to this study and the actual truth, James Taylor writes. Yes, Coal and Natural Gas are Much Cheaper Than Wind and Solar By James Taylor as published by Climate Realism on 4 March 2025 Renewable power advocates often claim wind and solar are less expensive energy sources than coal, natural gas and nuclear power. Such a claim begs the question of why the heavily subsidised Ivanpah solar power facility [in California] is going out of business, following a long line of other renewable energy project bankruptcies. Also, why would most of the world continue to build coal power plants if it is more expensive than wind and solar? The answer is wind and solar are expensive, financial losers. A recent peer-reviewed analysis proves that point. A recent  study , published in the peer-reviewed journal  Energy , reports on the “levelized full system costs” of electricity generation. The term “full system” is key. Many entities have assessed what it costs utilities to purchase or produce electricity from existing sources and deliver it to customers. These cost assessments, however, ignore the intermittency of wind and solar and how intermittency adds substantial costs to the entire electric grid. The cost assessments also fail to account for how wind and solar projects cannot be built just anywhere and often require new, long, expensive and inefficient transformation lines to deliver power from the generation locations to consumers. This also adds substantial costs to the overall electric grid. The peer-reviewed Energy study analyses these factors and presents an apples-to-apples cost comparison of the full system cost of wind, solar, coal, natural gas and nuclear power. The verdict is devastating to wind and solar power and explains why most of the world prefers to build coal and natural gas power plants. Geographic location is a significant factor in the cost of producing wind and solar power. For example, producing solar power in Germany, with its northern latitude and frequent cloudiness, is three times more expensive than producing solar power in the southern latitude and general sunniness of western Texas. Indeed, Texas is about as favourable an environment as there is for wind and solar power. In western Texas, in particular, the southern latitude, predominant sunshine and persistent windiness make for extremely favourable conditions for wind and solar power. Even in Texas, however, the Energy study shows wind and solar power are prohibitively expensive. The peer-reviewed study shows solar power produced in Texas is more than triple the cost of nuclear power, more than quadruple the cost of coal power and more than 10 times the cost of natural gas power. By the full system numbers, solar power in Texas costs $413 per megawatt hour (“MWh”) of generation. Wind power costs $291 per MWh. Nuclear power costs $122. Coal power costs $90. Natural gas power costs merely $40. That is a huge price differential between wind and solar versus all other energy sources. In most places, it costs even more to produce wind and solar power than in the favourable climate conditions of Texas. So, the disparity is typically greater than the numbers reported above. Another important factor to consider is a typical proposal for a new wind or solar power project does not entail building wind and solar to fill an imminent new power need. Typically, climate activists and monopoly utilities propose shutting down a perfectly operating – and already built and paid for – coal, nuclear or natural gas power plant and replacing it with wind and solar. Building a new wind or solar power project to provide power is substantially more expensive than building a new coal, nuclear or natural gas power plant to provide power. Shutting down an already paid-for coal, nuclear or natural gas power plant to build an expensive new wind or solar project makes even less economic sense. Utilities often support such wind and solar madness because they make a financial killing on wind and solar projects. Governments typically guarantee monopoly utilities an approximately 10% profit on their expenditures, including the cost of building new wind and solar projects. Construction for large solar projects can cost $2 billion, $3 billion or more. That means a guaranteed utility profit of $200 million or more per project. A utility pushing for more wind and solar power has nothing to do with saving consumers money and everything to do with stuffing the utility’s own pockets. The next time some climate activist or wind and solar shill claims wind and solar are less expensive than conventional energy sources, point them to the peer-reviewed Energy study and the actual truth. Note: The article above was originally posted on  The Center Square which is not available for IP addresses within a country belonging to the European Economic Area (“EEA”) including the EU which enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”). About the Author James Taylor is the President of the Heartland Institute . He is also the director of Heartland’s Arthur B. Robinson Centre for Climate and Environmental Policy. Taylor is the former managing editor (2001-2014) of Environment & Climate News , a national monthly publication devoted to sound science and free-market environmentalism.

Everything is reversible by cleaning up the gut lining and detoxing heavy metals.

https://expose-news.com/2025/03/03/technocracy-the-system-of-control-that-makes/ The world’s “reality” is being engineered through sophisticated technological systems and digital barriers.  These create a manufactured environment controlled by technocracy, a system of control passed down through institutions and bloodlines, involving key figures such as the Huxley brothers and the Rockefeller family. The technocratic agenda has shifted from creating compliant workers to managing population reduction, with a focus on artificial intelligence, automation and climate change messaging. Joshua Stylman suggests that resistance to the technocratic grid can be achieved through actions such as implementing strong privacy practices, developing critical media literacy skills and building local support networks.  He also recommends supporting decentralised technologies and creating parallel systems for education and information sharing. Yesterday, Brownstone Institute published an essay by Joshua Stylman titled ‘ The Technocratic Blueprint ’.  We have paraphrased Stylman’s essay below but we encourage our readers to take the time to read the full essay which you can find HERE or HERE . The world is increasingly engineered through sophisticated technological systems and invisible digital constraints, creating a manufactured environment that is similar to the one depicted in The Truman Show , where reality itself is manipulated and controlled. The driving force behind this manufactured world is technocracy, a system of control that has been passed down through institutions and bloodlines, with key figures such as Thomas Henry Huxley , known as “Darwin’s Bulldog,” and his descendants, including Aldous and Julian Huxley , playing important roles in shaping the modern world order. The connections between these people and other influential families, such as the Darwins and the Rockefellers, have created a powerful nexus of influence that spans science, culture and governance, and has evolved to incorporate new technological capabilities. Rockefeller once declared that “we need a nation of workers, not thinkers.”  Today, the focus of the technocratic agenda has shifted from creating compliant workers to managing population reduction, as artificial intelligence and automation eliminate the need for human labour, with BlackRock CEO Larry Fink explicitly stating that countries with declining populations will be more easily able to substitute humans with machines. The evolving agenda is reflected in various developments, including climate change messaging, declining birth rates and the normalisation of euthanasia, which are not random but rather logical extensions of the technocratic plan to manage and control the population. Normalising Control Through Technological Change The concept of a “ World Brain ,” envisioned by H.G. Wells in 1937, has become a reality with the advent of the internet.  It has also enabled the creation of a “Digital Hive Mind” that can be controlled and manipulated by those in power, further solidifying the technocratic grip on society. The concept of technocratic governance, as outlined by H.G. Wells in ‘ The Open Conspiracy ’, involves a movement of intelligent people who would lead a global transformation, with a class of educated and rational people assuming control of society. “Even his fictional work ‘ Shape of Things to Come ’ reads like a blueprint, particularly in its description of how a pandemic might facilitate global governance,” Stylman said. This plan found its institutional expression through Julian Huxley, who as the first Director-General of UNESCO, declared that the organisation’s philosophy should be a scientific world humanism, global in extent and evolutionary in background, which would eventually replace traditional faith with a new religious orthodoxy centred on science. “This quasi-religious devotion to scientific authority would become the framework for today’s unquestioning acceptance of expert proclamations on everything from vaccine mandates to climate policies,” Stylman explained. The Huxley family, including Julian and his brother Aldous, played a significant role in shaping this transformation, with Julian establishing the institutional framework for scientific world humanism at UNESCO, and Aldous revealing the psychological methodology for controlling populations through rapid technological change and gradual implementation of new control systems. In his 1958 interview with Mike Wallace , Aldous explained how rapid technological change could overwhelm populations, making them “lose their capacity for critical analysis.” Most crucially, Aldous emphasised the importance of “gradual” implementation. The strategy of gradualism, which involves carefully pacing technological and social changes to manage resistance and normalise new control systems over time, mirrors the Fabian Society’s approach and has been employed in various areas, including the erosion of privacy rights and the implementation of digital surveillance systems. Zbigniew Brzezinski later expanded on gradual implementation in his book ‘Between Two Ages’ which described a coming “technetronic era” marked by surveillance of citizens, control through technology, manipulation of behaviour and global information networks, with an elite dominating society and maintaining continuous surveillance over citizens.  The idea of a “World Brain,” an interconnected global information network, has become a reality through the rise of artificial intelligence (“AI”) and the internet.  The centralisation of knowledge and data is a key aspect of the technocratic ambition for an AI-powered global society, as seen in initiatives like the AI World Society, which mirrors the predictions of George Orwell’s dystopian society, where telescreens, Newspeak, memory holes and thoughtcrime have become a reality through smart devices, content moderation, digital censorship and social credit systems. Corporate media has played a significant role in promoting the “never offline” mentality, which has led to the widespread adoption of wearable surveillance devices that converge human biology and digital technology, known as the “Internet of Bodies,” and this pattern of previewing control systems through corporate media serves to normalise surveillance and position resistance as futile or backwards-looking. Normalising the Future of Control The ideas of visionaries like H.G. Wells and Aldous Huxley, who predicted control through pleasure, have been implemented through institutional frameworks, including the careful cultivation of future leaders who think and act as one, as outlined in Cecil Rhodes’ will, which aimed to create a new kind of empire through the creation of an elite network that would extend British influence globally. The Round Table Movement, which emerged from Rhodes’ blueprint, established influential groups in key countries, creating informal networks that shaped global policy for generations and led to the formation of key institutions of global governance, including the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations. These organisations played a significant role in creating the intellectual framework for policy-making and their members went on to establish the League of Nations, the United Nations (“UN”) and the Bretton Woods system, with Alice Bailey’s vision, articulated through Lucis Trust, influencing the spiritual and philosophical foundations of the UN. The network of influence envisioned by Rhodes has undergone a profound transformation since his time, from the 1.0 model of globalism that operated through nation states and colonialism to today’s Globalism 2.0, which operates through corporate and financial institutions, steering power toward centralised global governance without the need for formal empire. Organisations like the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and Tavistock Institute have spent decades guiding global programmes and policies, gradually centralising power, influence, and resources among an increasingly concentrated elite. The Rhodes Scholarships have served as a pipeline for identifying and cultivating future leaders who would advance the technocratic agenda while Bailey’s writings, particularly in ‘ The Externalisation of the Hierarchy ’, outlined a vision for global transformation that parallels many current UN initiatives, including reformed education systems, environmental programs, and economic integration, with a target date of 2025 for the “externalisation of the hierarchy”, which aligns with the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Today this game plan manifests through the World Economic Forum (“WEF”). Led by Klaus Schwab, who was mentored by Henry Kissinger, WEF is actively shaping this new world order, with its Young Global Leaders programme “penetrating cabinets” in countries around the world. Normalising Technocratic Ideas Edward Bernays, nephew of Sigmund Freud, developed the psychological framework for modern marketing and social media manipulation, which is now used to engineer consent and manage public opinion.  His techniques are being used to create predictive programming, where future control systems are presented as entertainment, normalising them before implementation. The co-founder of Netflix, Marc Bernays Randolph, is Edward Bernays’ great-nephew, which demonstrates how family influences and bloodlines continue shaping our cultural consumption today. Predictive programming operates through digital platforms and entertainment media, such as Hollywood, which serves as a primary vehicle for normalising technocratic ideas, and by repeatedly exposing people to future events or control systems, the public becomes psychologically conditioned to accept them as natural occurrences when they manifest in reality. Movies and TV shows consistently present future scenarios that later become reality, such as personalised advertising, brain-computer interfaces, social credit scores and mass surveillance, which are now being implemented in various forms.  Stylman gives some specific examples of movies and children’s shows in his essay that demonstrate this which we have not included here. Institutional Networks for Technocratic Control While Bernays and his successors developed the psychological framework for mass influence, implementing these ideas at the scale required a robust institutional architecture. This was developed through networks of influence, including organisations like the Fabian Society, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation. These institutions have used strategic funding and policy implementation to restructure society, creating interconnected mechanisms of control over health, knowledge, and other domains, often under the guise of philanthropy.  Modern technology philanthropists, such as Bill Gates, are continuing this pattern of social engineering, using their foundations to shape global health policy, invest in digital ID systems and control agricultural holdings, while also investing in surveillance technologies and synthetic foods.  His work demonstrates how modern philanthropists have perfected their predecessors’ methods of using charitable giving to engineer social transformation. The overall effect of these efforts is the creation of a technocratic system that is increasingly shaping the world, often without triggering significant resistance, due to the gradual and systematic nature of the changes being implemented. Modern Implementation of Control Systems Technocracy has its roots in predictions of resource scarcity and environmental concerns, which have led to the development of climate change messaging and population control initiatives, ultimately enabling control through resource allocation and demographic engineering. The modern implementation of technocratic control systems has achieved a level of control that earlier technocrats could only imagine.  It is characterised by the convergence of digital infrastructure, surveillance and behavioural modification with smart devices, AI assistants and algorithmic filters shaping our daily lives and worldviews. The digital environment monitors and shapes our behaviour through devices we willingly embrace, including news and information flow, workplace surveillance, automation, entertainment, social interactions and purchases, all of which are tracked and influenced through targeted advertising and recommendation systems. The infrastructure of technocracy, including digital surveillance and behavioural modification algorithms, provides the practical means for implementing control at scale, far beyond anything depicted in earlier concepts, with our health decisions, children’s education, travel and, increasingly, financial transactions all being guided and monitored through digital systems. The next phase of control systems is already emerging, with the development of Central Bank Digital Currencies (“CBDCs”), Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) scores and AI governance, which will create a comprehensive system of financial control, effectively codifying “cancel culture,” and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives into the monetary system. Initiatives like the Internet of Bodies and the development of smart cities, overseen by governing bodies like the C40 network, further demonstrate how the technocratic vision is being implemented in the present day.  These have the goal of creating a highly controlled and monitored society, as envisioned by earlier thinkers that have been outlined in Stylman’s essay. Resisting the Technocratic Grid The technocratic future is already here, Stylman warned. But understanding the vision of its key thinkers gives us the power to resist the control systems that are increasingly woven into the fabric of modern life through biological and psychological means. To resist these control systems, Stylman suggested we take actions such as implementing strong privacy practices, including encryption, data minimisation and secure communications, as well as developing critical media literacy skills and maintaining analogue alternatives to digital systems. Family and community building is also crucial.  This can be achieved by creating local support networks independent of digital platforms, teaching children critical thinking and pattern recognition, and establishing community-based economic alternatives. Systemic approaches to resistance include supporting and developing decentralised technologies, creating parallel systems for education and information sharing, building alternative economic structures, and developing local food and energy independence. Our daily resistance must occur through conscious engagement, using technology without being used by it, consuming entertainment while understanding its programming and participating in digital platforms while maintaining privacy.  Each choice becomes an act of conscious resistance.  While we cannot completely escape the technocratic grid, we can maintain our humanity within it through conscious action and local connection.